Re: Abdullah ibn Saba - The Myth Exposed
Thats quite ignorant of you. The statements of infallible imams are of course transmitted through their devoted followers (though fallible) and thats the reason we have science of hadith through which one can examine the authenticity of the narrator.
And if you still persist with the same pathetic logic of relying only on infallible ones (in terms of compilation) then you should remain aloof from your books since they were compiled and they contain some people who's faith have always been under scrutiny, forget about callimg them "Sahih" books.
Thats true! Who claimed otherwise? !!
lol, all our fundamental articles of beliefs are mentioned in detail in the Book of Allah which is infallible, we don't in fact need to rely on Sahih Books to be a Muslim or Ahlus Sunnah, on the other hand your fundamental belief of Imamat has no foundation in Quran, if there is mentioned the Imamat of Ibrahim then it is of Ibrahim not your Infallibles, so go and wash your face..
Even if I for the sake of argument accept that your Fallible narrators of hadith were so nice that they never did Taqiyyah in their lives, they were STILL FALLIBLES, or not?
Where were your so called Infallibles then?
Why didn't they write Infallible Books from their Infallible Hands for their LOYAL shias?
If they didn't do anything for you, then why do you stick to them? Stick to something useful then?