Peace Numb
Actually I can answer the questions, because I do know about what you believe in. I know because I made it my business to know. I have attended a few talks and events run by the Ahmadi group and I have literature written/endorsed by the Khalifah(s). What I have written is not a slur, it is presented as fact. Simple distinct difference, no emotion in it. I have not attempted to justify why you hold those beliefs all I have stated that those are the differences.
Your post proves my previous to be sound and accurate, let’s analyse:
You say Islam means peace. I sort of agree. However, your refutation is based not whether I know about Ahmadiyyat or not, rather it is based on the idea that my understanding of Jihad is grounded in war, whereas yours is not, and you are using references and logic to support the view that Jihad is not ‘war’ based. You know I agree to this also, the difference is however, I also include the necessity of war in the equation you will nearly always shy away from this stance. Look at what I wrote and look at what you wrote … your anger towards my understanding of Jihad proves that I am right about your view of it.
In my previous post I mentioned that Ahmadis ‘down tone’ miracles. Let’s see what you have presented above. You are using rhetoric of interesting facts to equate as miracle. For you the word miracle is reduced to a poetic term meaning ‘interesting’. That is what I said in my previous post that is what you have kindly proven for us to see. To answer the question that you raised about 100 jubilee and how wonderous it may be. I still think it pale in comparison to Islam spreading through the world in the 6th and 7th century. Today after 100 years Ahmadiyyat remains a minority. It is not recognised as mainstream Islam and for some it is not even classed as part of Islam due to the finality concept being compromised.
About supernatural - I will ignore your jest
I never called Ahmadis liars … and even if you were why would God need to punish you if he lets all those non-Muslims get away with their heedlessness? Come on bring better arguments, everone knows that complete Justice will be obtained in the aakhira!
Though the reference you have given of Ayesha (RA) is not from a book that I have access to it still is compatible to the understanding of AhlusSunnah walJammah on the count that the prophet who comes after Muhammad (SAW) will be the one who has yet to die, the one that was raised in person, Isa (AS) ibn Maryam, not ibn Bibi Saleem. There is no appointment of prophethood after Muhammad (SAW), but prophet who was appointed before Muhammad (SAW) will return.
With regard to prophethood that too can be interpreted in a manner that is compatible with AhlusSunnah in that the prophethood of Muhammad (SAW) is continuous, though he is not here with us his legacy remains in the form of Qur’an (in tact) and hadith (classified). All ummatees all have a similar task to prophets too, because we are instructed to give dawah like the prophets.
So all in all … what evidence you have is interpretable in both ways, what claim I made you have proven to be true regarding your beliefs because you have been defending that stance. Do you still think I am not qualified to relate the Ahmadi belief?