A question to Ahmadis

Qadiyanis and British colonials

I was thinking about it one day that British have a history of 'divide and rule'. They first divided subcontinent into Hindus and Muslims who were united politically to much extent, they had a threat from Muslims so they further divided Muslims into sects as Barelvis who were pro-British as they didn't promote Jihad (holy war against infidels).

The hatred of Christians towards Prophet Muhammad s.a.w was not yet satisfied so they established a new faith Ahmedism or Qadiyanism to attack Islam from within. Qadiyanism as well taught not to fight the British occupation forces.

I consider British more dangerous than Americans, it's only that they are not as powerful today as Americans are, British have the same blood as was in their bloodsucking savage Crusaders. I hope the day comes when Americans embrace Islam as Mongols did.