A Question of Tennis

Alright, so here is the scenario.
[thumb=H]tennisQ12052_2652317.JPG[/thumb]
They are playing doubles. Player A, plays a cross shot that was picked up from outside the court line by player C. His return lands inside the court, but it was low. So low that it would not have crossed the net, but made it through cz he had picked it from outside the court line and bypassed the net. Will the point go to C or to A?

Re: A Question of Tennis

A

but depends on who player A and C are...

Re: A Question of Tennis

The point should go to A.

Re: A Question of Tennis

Would it make a difference if C's return was high enough to cross the net (but still bypassed the net)?

And what rule are we citing to not award the point to C? He picked up the ball and his return landed inside the court.

Re: A Question of Tennis

The ball was picked up from outside the court, it was out.

Re: A Question of Tennis

^ Oh come on!!! You routinely pick ball outside the court (at the back), especially if you are playing doubles.

Re: A Question of Tennis

As soon as the ball from Player A lands outside the court the line judge would call it out and that would be the end of the point. The point would go to Player C's team.

Is this a trick question?

MM

Re: A Question of Tennis

The point should go to A if the ball bounced in-bounds before being played by C. However, if C is playing the ball on the fly, then the point is clearly C's, since the ball hit by A would have landed out of bounds. However, it would depend on a bunch of things.

If this was at Wimbledon (or any Grand Slam match), it would be highly probable that the judge (umpire) would make the right call.

If this was at a casual game, it would depend on the integrity of those involved.

If the players were all desi's....a whole bunch of issues would be raised.
Age, gender and nationality would be a factor. In all likelihood, the match would end and everyone would go out for some samaos and chai.

Re: A Question of Tennis

The shot from A was fine. It bounced off inside the court and then was picked up by player C, who then returned it from outside the courtline.

Re: A Question of Tennis

This actually happened at Wimbeldon this year. The return was high enough to cross the net and than landed inside the court. The point was awarded to C.

As to your point that why the point should not be awarded to C even though the ball landed in the court, because his return was low and would have hit the net.

Re: A Question of Tennis

Thats what I thought (although I didn’t see it in Wimbledon). Even though the ball didn’t actually went over the net.

I understand the point and the logic, but I am not sure which umpire will call it. The net is there for a reason, so how would the umpire estimate whether the ball would go over the net or not. The chair umpire can’t figure it out based on his position. And I can’t find any rule that applies to this situation.

The official rules 24 and 25 explain how a point is lost and won. Here you go

Re: A Question of Tennis

I wanna say the ball has to cross over the net, not pass by it, no matter the height.

Re: A Question of Tennis

That seems logical, but as ehsan pointed out, not necessarily true. Plus, I can’t find a rule which says that the ball has to cross over the net. Can you quote a rule that says it? Ofcourse, its a fairly rare occurance, but since it happened yesterday, so I am curious.

Re: A Question of Tennis

Infact, what do you make of this?

*Rule 25 A GOOD RETURN *
It is a good return if:

c. The ball is returned outside the net posts, either above or below the
level of the top of the net, even though it touches the net posts, provided
that it hits the ground in the correct court; except as provided
in Rules 2 and 24 (d); or