Re: A question … especially for …
Brother, I am not disappointed of Pakistan or its future … I am just trying to put what I understand and what I think is best for a country, that is to say what is really wrong and expect that once it comes in discussion, something would be done.
Actually believe me, personally I am not too much disappointed with CJ decision. Not because I like or hate CJ or President Musharraf.
What I feel is that the decision has given a big stick to President (if he realises and decides to use it for betterment of Pakistan). Just imagine, because of that decision. …
Today President (at least legally) could not drop cases of BB and other corrupts in any negotiations (excuse: free judiciary).
Today opposition could not stop Presidential election in between 15th Sept – 15th October. (excuse: free judiciary)
Today, President could not make excuse to dissolve parliament earlier then due time. [Judiciary would not let it happen … hopefully ;)]
Today religious and political parties cannot break laws and expect concessions. [Judiciary is free and they would give verdict against that, means, executives have to follow laws]
Today, government can easily demolish all illegally constructed buildings (like so-called illegally constructed madrassas and mosques, or any illegally constructed buildings used for whatever purposes). [These are against the law. Judiciary is free and they can direct what government should follow]
Today, in the name of law, government can implement many things if they want to. [When there is will to do good, judiciary would be helpful, Judiciary has to follow laws and on paper, all laws that parliamentarian enact are normally good]
Today, no judge or lawyers could expect extra from government than what law allows. [Perceptions of conflicts between judiciary and executives’ means, judiciary should not expect sweeteners]
And so on: … As far as power to break the law, they are always there in the hand of those that have that power, but then that would be going against the law, as it was yesterday unlawful as today. Judiciary is not law enforcement body nor do they have that sort of resources (or power) to implement or enforce laws (even their own verdicts). They can only follow whatever laws are there and ask executives to implement or enforce that laws what they judiciary considers as law (from what is there in constitution).
Sometime thinking the good that can come from this decision make me feel bad when bringing all those allegations that was there against CJ that is now under the carpet. But then, I still believe that mentioning that would bring some awareness and if discussed a lot, in future, people (in power and positions) would not get involved in such devilish deeds.
I am hopeful for the country because as in any country Pakistan has good as well as bad. But from very poor, underdeveloped, divided, tribal and illiterate society that Pakistan was in 1947, only united in the name of Islam, Pakistan has come a long way and there are many good and committed people in Pakistan that to their best capacity, are always trying to stand against corrupt devils and trying to take masks from their faces.