One will note that this debate has runneth its course! Iqbal has completely resorted to nit-pick and deviated from the content of the message:
Iqbal,
Have you fiqured out what Allah means to you as per previous post?
[quote]
from Hafeez:
The problem is you are coming from a different dogma and refuse to accept anything different like a Manifest God even though the quran says that "He can be manifest or hidden"[HQ 57:3]!
Response from Iqbal:
"The problem is you **don't understand the term 'manifest' **as used in the Qur'an. God being manifest, for example, does not mean that he came down to earth to reside in a woman's womb, then was born and circumcised and finally murdered. This is certainly not what the Qur'an means when it says God is manifest."
IMPORTANT:
So, according to you (Iqbal) the "Manifest" deity stays in the heaven, on a throne! If he came down that will be like "occupying space" or "having an Image" and is the reason why our Sunni Islam places these LIMITS on the limit-less Allah! We tell Allah what he can be or not be - just to win a theological arguement!
In matters of debate one either nit-pick on petty matters or present the message or significance of the verses. Sorry, you have chosen the former or like Ibrahim call names like "concoct", " made it up", "do not know what it means", etc.
[QUOTE]
from Iqbal:
"There is no verse in the Qur'an which has the exact wording that you have given. "
[/QUOTE]
Iqbal is referring to this verse that I have stated in this thread more than once - everytime without the verse #:
" there is nothing but Allah. Where-ever you turn there is the face of Allah"
Is the message of the verse incorrect?
Here's the full verse that Iqbal is talking about callimg me a liar:
"To Allah belong the East and the West. Wherever you turn, there is Allah's Face. For Allah is All-Embracing, All-Knowing." (2:115).
Then he proceeds to present his simplistic analysis, in much the same ways, as was done for other verses. I guess according to him- the north & south doesn't belong to allah and to say that would be a lie!
Same with the rest of his last post:
He has issue with the verse that I posted re "Jesus being the Father", or:
[quote]
from Iqbal:
"Another example of your inability to present accurate quotations. Let's look at this one as well:
[/quote]
Iqbal corrects me by saying that I must have been thinking about:
"Father, just as you are in me and i am in you." (John 17:21, NIV).
His ego has gotten in the way - big time!
Actually, the verse I was quoting was this:
*"I and the Father are one" (John 10:30). *
The message is the same. Concentrate on the message!
There is Nothing but Allah!