Re: A disappointing Dr Zakir Naik
Ok here comes a hater, Hazrat Ali did it for Khilafat, I like ur message from one expect that u picked one, (Usman and mavia) or Ali a.s not both, since both cant be rite. Now the worst word u said, he Hazret Ali A.s did it for Khilfat is just ur theory, if u r sunni open ur own books where Hazrat Ali a.s was offered postion as 3rd califh and he refused. ( he refused coz he was to offer Aligence to Sunnat Mohammed s.aw , Quran and Shekhieen and he refused saying If he follows shekhieen then he is not following Quran and Prophet s.a.w sunnat, so its not possible) if he wanned the seat that much he could have get it there... However if u r wahabi, salafi and other among those then dont bother reading ur books cause they r only arnd 300 years old as wahabi's didnt have a history before ....
I asked a simple question. Now, Ali [raz] was a great person like other sahabas but I don't get why didn't he prosecute the killers of the 3rd caliph and had people from the same tribe in his army. It paramounts to a cause of a fitna in the first place!!!!
In the end, what it did was set a bad precedent for future when muslims killed other muslims for power, $$$ etc. What did Umer and the 3 caliphs did that you shias slander them that much? you yourself said that ali was content with them being the 3 caliphs so why shias create this fitna of badmouthing the first 3 caliphs. I had a shia manager who once told me that she would name her dogs after the first 3 caliphs so I can understand where you guys come from.....