Re: his last match...play it well...sir
Nope, I never questioned the legitimacy of the PCO, nor the leaglity of Musharraf's rule. It's all legal and quite legitimate, and validated over and over again - by parliament and the Supreme Court. Rana at least has been consistent with his views since he swore an oath on the PCO, and does not go on about "upholding the 1973 constitution" and all that jazz. Not like some very hypocritcal senior judges we know, and their supporters. :)
Well, there is only one constitution and thats the one from 1973 and the system of govt is under that constitution. PCO was a decree issued by Mushrraf, and later on it was made part of law to give it legal cover.
Anyway, coming back to PCO, either you're far it or against it. If you think PCO is part of laws-a valid law approved (not passed) by the parliament than you can't question the judges of the SC who took oath under PCO. Or if you're against than say so b/c that mean you disagree with the whole thing, and therefore you're questioning all the actions taken by the Mushrraf regime. So, which one is it?