Getting desperate I see?
Like I said, Kashmir's common history with India ends with the Kushans back in 300 AD.
Whatever economic links Kashmir had with the Subcontinent were with what is now Pakistan.
It was actually 75 lacs, genius. Thanks for the deceptive "clarification."
The Kashmiri areas.
If the Paharis, Gojris, Ladakhis, and other people of J&K decide they want to join us, I wouldn't stop them.
Well as i had said you would have to change the definition of the subcontinent to accomodate your view, so now it is connected to Pakistan..... atleast you agreed that it was connected to subcontinent .... otherwise the other guy had started linking Kashmir with Tibet and China!!!!!!
Just for info, budhism in Kashmir was prevelant during the time it was prevelant in India. So this was not something unique to Kashmir. And once buddhism started to vain in India, it did the same in Kashmir. Shankaracharya was responsible for the revivial of hindusim after buddhism had been in vogue for some centuries. Hope you remeber this guy as all kashmiri see the temple on top of " Takht - e - suleiman" as Shankaracharya temple.
Well thanks for agreeing it was not a few thousand rupees but 75 lakhs .....