Re: 31 convicted in Godhra train burning case
LOL. So whoever does not agree with your point is biased?
Simply put. Modi could have stopped the massacre of so many people and he did not for the sake of hatred and had deliberately let people die.
Whole world and the Indian Muslims know.
Who does not know? The Indian Supreme court and jokers sitting on it.
http://indianmuslims.in/narendra-modi%E2%80%99s-gujarat-is-not-developing-maulana-vastanwi/
http://indianmuslims.in/narendra-modi-travails-of-travel-abroad/
Recently (April 8, 2010), a group of German MPs justified the denial of visa to Modi. They advocated a ban on his visiting Europe. This parliamentary delegation was on a two day visit to the city of Ahmedabad to study the state of minorities in Gujarat.** It concluded that the European Union (EU) decision not to grant visa to him was justified. They went to the extent of banning his trip to Europe in near future.** They pointed out that “the Chief Minister of Gujarat has a radical tone to his politics and is described as dictatorial. He has a wrong perception of religious freedom.†This four member team has been closely following developments in the Gujarat riot cases.
One member of delegation pointed out that** he was shocked by parallels between Germany under Hitler and Gujarat under Modi. Incidentally in Gujarat school books Hitler has been glorified as a great nationalist.** Modi, in response to this has written to Prime Minister to seek apology from the German delegation for tarnishing the image of democratically elected head of state. The Congress Government endorsed Modi’s view and clarified that the EU had put a ban on Modi’s visit in the aftermath of Gujarat carnage but that has been withdrawn. Also that it was not an official delegation. Whatever that be, the opinion of the members of the delegation does reflect a deeper truth of our political phenomenon.US Consular division had taken a strong stand against Modi, the Hindutva icon. They denied him diplomatic visa apparently holding him responsible for communal carnage of 2002. In addition, his tourist/business visa which was already granted was revoked under a section of US Immigration and Nationality Act since he was not coming for a purpose that qualifies for a diplomatic visa.
http://www.twocircles.net/2010apr27/british_indian_muslims_applaud_german_mps_condemning_modi.html
http://in.news.yahoo.com/godhra-riots--sit-report-confirms-charges-against-modi.html
Tehelka’s Ashish Khetan writes: “Far from giving Modi a clean chit, in its report dated 12 May 2010 that the Supreme Court has kept under wraps, the SIT found Modi guilty on many counts: a communal mindset, inflammatory speeches, destruction of crucial records, appointment of Sangh members as public, illegal positioning of ministers in police control rooms during the riots, and persecution of neutral officers.”
The police did not investigate the role of BJP and VHP members in the riots, the SIT has found.
The bodies of victims of the Godhra arson (where a mob set fire to a railway coach) were handed over to VHP members, and inflamed passions. The SIT blames a junior officer for this action.
The SIT says the Gujarat government requisitioned the army quickly, but does not ask why it was not deployed in time.
Top policeman R R Sreekumar testifies to many unconstitutional acts by Modi, but the SIT says other policemen are unwilling to corroborate what he says.
The SIT admits it has not examined several crucial records, and questioned several people in the know.
Need more ‘break’ ?
So blame Modi for dereliction of duty all you want
But there is no legal case against him. And in a democracy dereliction of duty counts for zilch if the majority wants to vote you to power.