Re: 31 convicted in Godhra train burning case
Listen, dont be stupid… Show us the evidence. You wont convince anyone except your fellow Indians. If you have something to contribute, then do so. If not then why are you barking?
This is an open forum. SHOW us your evidence.
Im sure eventually they will get around to investigating some cases. But tall claims require tall evidence. So again, google is your friend. Even I posted a link to an article that shows that eventually, when they can, your justice system does prosecute a few, but its usually painfully slow.
No one buys this nonsense that Godhra mob was easier to prosecute then the thousands murdering people in broad day light. You actually sound like an idiot when you say that.
Now I dont know why you investigators were able to solve the Godhara case, but not be able to prosecute anyone involved in the riots. That’s for you to explain. Im just pointing out something that glaringly obvious to everyone except deluded Indians like you.
with the amount of time you spent further embarrassing yourself typing this post demanding evidence of convictions from very high profile and highly publicized indian court cases, you could have just googled it yourself.
Because your to much of a tool to actually do the research yourself. Here is what Human Rights Watch has to say to say on the situation. Granted this is from 2004, but how much has really changed in India? This atleast gives some insight on why the rioters were not prosecuted, while those involved in the train fire have.
“Two years after the Gujarat riots, witnesses are being threatened and sometimes even attacked,” said Brad Adams, executive director of Human Rights Watch’s Asia Division. “Not only has the Gujarat government failed to pursue those responsible for the riots, it is obstructing justice by its failure to protect witnesses.”
The violence in 2002 started with an attack in Godhra on a train carrying Hindus. Fifty-nine people died when a train carriage caught fire. In a retaliatory spree by Hindu mobs, hundreds of Muslims were slaughtered, tens of thousands were displaced, and their property was destroyed. Two years later, Muslims still live in fear because their attackers remain free and continue to make threats, particularly against those involved in prosecutions.
While investigations in the Godhra case proceeded rapidly, with several indicted Muslims charged under the recently repealed Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), investigations into cases related to the anti-Muslim riots that followed were deliberately slow. The lower courts dismissed many cases for lack of evidence after public prosecutors effectively acted as defense counsel or witnesses turned hostile after receiving threats"
To their credit however, the “Indian Supreme Court to move some trials out of Gujarat to allow for a more impartial atmosphere and greater protection for witnesses, victims and lawyers.”India: After Gujarat Riots, Witnesses Face Intimidation | Human Rights Watch
you are a remarkably unintelligent individual. you are posting something from 2004. do you think convictions that may have taken place in any of the years 2005-2011 could have ended up in that report? that may be a complex mathematical brain buster for you, but for others it’s common sense.