Re: 31 convicted in Godhra train burning case
Huh. I have a solution: let’s charge Teesta Setalvad with sedition, ala Arundathi Roy, and try to force her into silence!!!
BTW your suggestion that just because someone is “married to a Muslim” means she cannot be objective is frankly insulting. Was the judge deciding the Gojra case an atheist? What if he/she still happened to have a Muslim/Hindu spouse or a close relative in the family? Is that ground to call into question his/her objectivity and doubt the veracity of the verdict?