1990 election was rigged: SC

**That’s it. where is the punishment? What about ex-President’s and ex COAS’s role in this fraud? What happened to the political parties heads who got this bribe from ISI, President and army? This CJ is getting 8.9 millions salary for deciding key issues not related to PPP like this. Shame on him. jis ko dekho public ko mama bana rya hay.
**

http://dawn.com/2012/10/15/asghar-khan-petition-sc-resumes-hearing-3/

Former ISI chief’s funds disbursement unconstitutional, violation of oath: CJ

ISLAMABAD: During Monday’s hearing of the petition filed by Air Martial (retd) Asghar Khan pertaining to Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) distributing money among politicians, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry remarked that former ISI chief Lt-Gen (retd) Asad Durrani’s disbursing of funds constituted the violation of the Constitution and the violation of his oath, DawnNews reported.

A three-judge bench, headed by Chief Justice Iftikhar, has been hearing the 1996 petition filed by Khan who had accused the ISI of financing politicians in the 1990 elections by dishing out Rs140 million to create the Islami Jamhoori Ittehad (IJI) and prevent Benazir Bhutto’s PPP from winning the polls. The petition was based on an affidavit of Durrani.

During the hearing, Durrani told the bench that former president Ghulam Ishaq Khan had ordered the distribution in the greater national interest.

Upon which, the chief justice asked what he meant by the term “national interest”, adding that, the idea of national interest must not be abused.

The chief justice said national interest was fulfilled when the country’s internal matters were handled by the government and its borders were protected by the armed forces.

The military’s job was to protect the borders, the chief justice said, adding that, whosoever should be given the right to form the government was up to the people.

Chief Justice Iftikhar moreover remarked as to how could the manipulation of an election to ensure the defeat of a certain political party be in the greater national interest.

The chief justice said the president should not act as a party as the head of state was the symbol of the federation. He further said that Ghulam Ishaq Khan should not have supported the IJI.

Chief Justice Iftikhar said it was the people’s authority to empower a political party, adding that, what Durrani did was unconstitutional and a violation of his oath.

Durrani said whatever was done, was done under orders from above and he was admitting to the responsibility as that was in the greater national interest.

He further said that Brig (Rtd) Hamid Saeed Akhtar also had a role in the distribution of money.

Earlier during the hearing, Secretary to President Asif Ali Zardari, Malik Asif Hayat, appeared before the bench.

Hayat said the case was old and a response would be filed over it as soon as the records were recovered.

Justice Jawwad S. Khawaja inquired of the president’s secretary as to whether a political cell was currently operating in the President House.

Upon which, Hayat said that he had no information on any political activity in the President House.

He further said that a response could be filed before the bench once complete records had been recovered.

Moreover, former bureaucrat Roedad Khan submitted his written response before the bench.

Khan, in his response, asked why his name was being dragged into an old case, adding that, he had no idea whether or not a political cell was operating in the President House.

The former bureaucrat further said that he was ready to go to Adiyala prison if it could be proven that he was aware of any political activity in the President House.

Justice Khawaja said it still needed to be determined what relation the political cell had with the President House.

Khan told the court that Durrani’s statements were not based on facts, adding that, he (Khan) had never met with Gen (retd) Mirza Aslam Beg.

Re: Former ISI chief’s funds disbursement unconstitutional, violation of oath: CJ

You do realize the case is still being heard? I hope you know the difference between 'remarks' and 'decision' by courts.

Re: Former ISI chief’s funds disbursement unconstitutional, violation of oath: CJ

1990 elections were rigged, rules SC

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

The Supreme Court has passed the interim order that the elections in 1990 were rigged, now the culprits need to be punished (all of them).

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

This is perfect way to know the Takht e Lahore mentality and its aides intermediate pass intellectuals of Pindi .
You can understand it more easily from changing title of this thread

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

Bold decision by SC once again. Hearing a 16 year old case after the repeated appeals by IK and AK. Credit must go to them too.

First time two ex army generals are held responsible for political corruption. Kudos!

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

The COAS of that time was not from Punjab,

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

When one goes to Pindi ,He is Pindi wala for life .
All crooks Ayoub ,Yahay , Zia , Mush and the grandson of Meer Jaffer Gen Sikendar Mirza no one was from Lahore .
They helped the mentality . Now proved in SC .
And also from change .......

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

^ the correct term should be takht e Pindi then...

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

Once again "half justice" by SC when it comes to "par jalney wali jagha".

I am by no mean a PPP supporter but I can tell you that if it was the case against PPP (like it was against Gillani), tu SC nai ghar tak chooor ker aana tha. If SC has constituted that rigging was in fact done and Aslam Baig and Durrani are in fact guilty of doing that, whats stopping them from passing a order? and if rigging has been done and money has been "given", that automatically means that it was "taken" too. What about the politicians who took money?

This is a pattern all along. Whenever SC want to avoid the case they ask "govt" to do the investigation and take appropriate action but if its something that SC "really want to take care of", they pass strict orders be it "tauheen e aadalt" case or setting the prices of sugar.

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

No ! Lahore as evident from the change .....

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

I agree with your posts. I failed to read the full 16 points and there is no mention of the politicians who took money. SC is azaad for sure, but they are kind of biased towards PPP cases.

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

the politicians involved should have been punished, no two ways about it.

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

Name one general from south and central Punjab. Punjab is not the name of one division of the province.

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

Generals running GS? Ma'sha Allah.

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

Have I used the name of Punjab .
There was no Punjab before Maharaja Ranjeet Singh . It was Lahore province ever even never a state of Lahore .

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

..

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

The elections were rigged keeping the national interest in mind.

SC says former Army chief, DG ISI, president involved in rigging 1990 elections – The Express Tribune

Earlier, former head of the MI Sindh chapter Brigadier Hamid Saeed submitted his statementclaiming that the 1990 operation was initiated by the army and supervised by the MI for “national interest”.

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

You and general are same , Every one is General here .
I am asking for restoration of the title.

Re: 1990 election was rigged: SC

They do it often .
Have a look now at Lahore ,Karachi,Quetta show
And
on the day when Sonami ended for ever in Nala Lai near Liaqat Bagh .
Midnight of August 13-14 .