1.6 Million Iraqi Children have died.. (merged)

‘Millions of Iraqis live on food aid; the health system is fractured, malnutrition is rife, especially among children and a war would unleash a humanitarian crisis of exceptional scale and magnitude’

UN predicts humanitarian nightmare if war in Iraq](http://www.cbc.ca/stories/2003/02/13/uniraq030213) CBC News 13 Feb 2003

UNITED NATIONS - If there is a war in Iraq, the United Nations says up to 10 million people may need need food and other forms of international aid. Human rights groups have been demanding that the UN reveal what they contend are “secret plans” for humanitarian relief.

On Thursday, a senior UN official detailed some of those plans, and admitted that the UN doesn’t have the money to pay for them. Roger Normand with the New-York based Centre for Economic and Social Rights says Iraq has already been reduced to something akin to a vast refugee camp. Millions of Iraqis live on food aid; the health system is fractured, malnutrition is rife, especially among children and a war would unleash a humanitarian crisis of exceptional scale and magnitude.

“There will be a humanitarian disaster in the event of war, The UN and relief agencies are not prepared to handle this disaster. The Iraqi population is far more vulnerable than it was in 1991,” he said. Human rights groups have been hounding the UN in recent weeks, accusing it of engaging in secret planning for the aftermath of a war. The UN says it has held its plans back because it doesn’t want to send a signal that it believes war is inevitable.

But on Thursday, the Security Council did meet to discuss humanitarian needs in case of war and UN emergency relief co-ordinator Kenzo Oshima released what he called some of the UN’s “assumptions.” “Up to 10 million people may require food assistance during and immediately after a conflict,” said Oshima.

Most Iraqis are currently fed by the UN-sponsored oil-for-food program, but Oshima said a war would force the UN’s staff to flee the country and the food distribution system would likely collapse. Electricity and clean water would be hard to come by. As well, up to two million Iraqis would be made homeless: one million of those could become refugees in neighbouring countries.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Dil he Pakistani: *
'Millions of Iraqis live on food aid; the health system is fractured, malnutrition is rife, especially among children and a war would unleash a humanitarian crisis of exceptional scale and magnitude'
[/QUOTE]

And what will happen under a continuation of the current sanctions regime? As the title of this thread indicates, allegedly 1.6 million Iraqi children have died.

I find it interesting that many anti-war people think continuation of the sanctions with stricter and more intrusive inspections are the answer to containing Iraq. I truly believe the war scenario is better for the Iraqi people than the sanctions scenario.

Then there are those who just don't want war and don't want sanctions and are quite happy living in La La Land thinking Saddam will be a good boy and not pose a threat to his people, his neighbors and the rest of the world.

Some UNICEF reports:

“Malnutrition down by half among Iraqi children”, UNICEF Press Release, 21 November 2002

“Despite improvements there are still close to one million children under the age of five suffering from chronic malnutrition in Iraq today - that’s nearly a quarter of all children of that age,” said Mr. Carel de Rooy, the head of UNICEF in Iraq. “This is unacceptable. More still needs to be done to end the suffering of a generation of children.”

“Overview of Nutritional Status of Under-fives in South/Centre Iraq”, UNICEF report, 21 November 2002

“Donor Update”, UNICEF report, 14 January 2003

With thousands of Iraqi children dying from malnutrition and water bourne diseases, its absolutely horrendous that the war mongers are planning another devastating war against Iraq. No doubt they will again target the civilian infrastructure, the water treatment plants and the electricity generation stations. It will be like a slow death for thousands of Iraqis :disgust:. It is this potential Humanitarian disaster that is bringing millions of people onto the streets to protest against war. They know the amount of suffering that will be unleashed on the civilian population. They know how hundreds of Iraqi women and children were incinerated to death in a missile attack in the last war, they know that thousands of Iraqi children have suffered from cancers directly attributable to DU weapons dropped on Southern Iraq. They know that this is more of a personal crusade by Bush to oust Sadam and replace him with another dictator who will sign over Iraqs Oil Reserves to the US Oil Conglomerates.

Not certain who’s listening to them, but UNICEF continues issuing statements:

“UNICEF and Partners Push Ahead With Polio and Measles Campaigns for Iraqi Children”, *UNICEF Press Release*, 18 February 2003

“Comments by Carol Bellamy on Iraq at the Palais briefing”, *UNICEF Briefing Note*, 28 January 2003

"The international community has some very dramatic decisions to make in the next few days and weeks. Those decisions will have an enormous impact on the children of Iraq. This is no small matter, because almost half of Iraq’s total population of 23.6 million people are children. (11.3 million under the age of 18.)

At UNICEF we are still hopeful that the current crisis will end without war."
~ ~ ~
“The situation of Iraqi children has been very difficult for more than 15 years,” said Carol Bellamy, Executive Director of UNICEF. “No matter what the global situation, we cannot shrink from the ongoing work of reaching out to help them. Amidst many distractions, we must all keep the children of Iraq uppermost in our minds and do everything we can to protect them.”

Bellamy pointed out that one out of eight Iraqi children dies before the age of five - one of the worst rates in the world. She also noted that:

· One-third of Iraqi children are malnourished
· One-quarter are born underweight
· One quarter of school-age children do not go to school
· One-quarter do not have access to safe water

“There’s just no question that Iraqi children are extremely vulnerable,” Bellamy said. “Whatever comes, their health and well-being must continue to be a priority.”

“For many people, this campaign is an act of hope and faith in the future. And it’s a major achievement for a country that has been devastated by two major wars and 12 years of sanctions.”

Yeah that's terrible. Polio is a scourge that needs to be eradicated. Maybe one or two less palaces can help.

Saddam is to blame for this starvation but the world does not seem to care.

Iraq Lagging in Buying Food, Medicine for Needy, U.N. Complains
U.N. “gravely concerned” about small Iraqi purchases.

This is a article from January 19, 2001

United Nations – The head of the U.N. humanitarian program for Iraq said Iraq is not spending the money allocated for the humanitarian needs of Iraqi civilians at an adequate level.

In a letter to the Security Council’s Iraq Sanctions Committee, Benon Sevan, executive director of the Office of Iraq Program, expressed his “grave concern over the very slow rate of submissions of applications” to purchase food, medicine and other supplies needed by Iraqi civilians under the council’s oil-for-food program. U.N. spokesman Fred Eckhard released the letter to the public January 18.

As of January 15, 2001 the total value of the supplies Iraq wanted to purchase and submitted to Sevan’s office for clearance was just over $4.26 billion while there was actually more than $7.98 billion allocated in the program’s budget, Sevan said.

He noted that food purchases exceeded $1.58 billion and were approved by the sanctions committee in “a very timely manner.”

“I am gravely concerned, however, with regard to the unacceptably slow rate of submission of applications, in particular under the health, education, water and sanitation, as well as the oil sectors,” Sevan said. “Despite all the concerns expressed regarding the nutritional and health status of the Iraqi people, the total value of applications received under the health sector was only $83.61 million against the $624.75 million allocated.”

“Likewise, the total value of applications received for the education, water and sanitation, and oil sectors, was, respectively $21.58 million, $184.76 million, and $22.75 million against the distribution plan budget of $351.50 million, $551.16 million, and $600 million,” he said.

The oil-for-food program allows Iraq to sell oil under strict U.N. supervision with the proceeds used to buy food, medicine, and other humanitarian supplies for Iraqi civilians along with spare parts for the oil industry and the other sectors such as electric and sanitation. For many Iraqi civilians the food rations supplied through the program are critical, U.N. officials have said.

The U.N. program and the sanctions committee had been criticized for delaying approval of shipments while checking to ensure that the supplies were to meet the needs of Iraqi civilians and not for the Iraqi military or weapons programs. Sevan pointed out that the processing and approval of applications has been expedited, but the U.N. efforts are not enough to resolve the supply problems.

He also complained that Iraq is not informing the office of the number and value of contracts signed prior to the submission of applications by the suppliers. Thus, he said, “it is difficult to ascertain the main cause” of the lack of contracts during the six-month phase which ended in January.

This is the second time in less than a week that the U.N. has reported a slowdown in Iraq’s participation in the oil-for-food program. During the week of January 6 to 12 Iraqi oil exports were below average. Iraq had three oil loadings at its Mina al-Bakr terminal totaling 4.7 million barrels of oil which raised an estimated $91.5 million in revenue. There were no loadings of Iraqi oil at the terminal at Ceyhan, Turkey.

According to the U.N. oil overseers, Iraq exported about 18 million barrels of crude oil in December – some 50 million barrels less than expected – for an estimated loss of $1 billion in revenue as a result of the reduced exports. During the first 10 days of January the exports were 22 million barrels below those anticipated for an estimated loss of $380 million.

In December, the Security Council adopted a resolution lifting the cap on the amount of oil Iraq could export and allowing about 72 percent of the oil revenue to go to the humanitarian program. Previously 66 percent of the funds were going to the humanitarian program. Twenty-five percent of the revenue goes to the Compensation Commission, 2.2 percent is used to cover the U.N. costs for administering the program, and 0.8 percent of the revenue goes for the administration of the U.N. Monitoring and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) on the Iraq/Kuwaiti border.

U.N. spokesman Fred Eckhard said that the U.N. was hard-pressed to explain Iraq’s inaction.

“There is no ceiling on the amount of oil they can export. It’s all just a matter of their capacity. But they are well below capacity; they are well below previous levels of export. Why they are doing that, they will have to say” Eckhard said.

…because Saddam uses the Iraqi people as pawns to stay in power.

http://usinfo.state.gov/regional/nea/iraq/offtxts/judy125.htm

UTD… how would you feel if i utilized an iraq.gov website as a reference?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Nadia_H: *

UTD... how would you feel if i utilized an iraq.gov website as a reference?
[/QUOTE]

Nadia,
Do deny that The head of the U.N. humanitarian program for Iraq said Iraq is not spending the money allocated for the humanitarian needs of Iraqi civilians at an adequate level?

UTD, While i wait for your independent, non government-affiliated source, you can peruse this - please read the following paras. carefully and do a word count of how many times one comes across the words “Saddam Hussein”, and “sanctions”:

…] As has been documented by United Nations agencies, NGOs, humanitarian and human rights organizations, researchers and political leaders, the sanctions upon Iraq have produced a humanitarian disaster comparable to the worst catastrophes of the past decades.

…] The health crisis in Iraq is intertwined with the general social and economic crises which the sanctions have prompted. Even if the deaths were to cease as the result of humanitarian exemptions (as the Secretary-General and others deem impossible), there would still be massive, systematic violations of Iraqi citizens’ other rights attributable to the sanctions. The economic, social and cultural rights of the Iraqi people are being swept aside, as are their rights to development and to education

…]The sanctions regime against Iraq is unequivocally illegal under existing international humanitarian law and human rights law.
~ ~ ~
How many times did you read “government of Iraq” or “Saddam Hussein” in that paragraph? How many times did you read “sanctions”? And here’s a surprise - i didn’t even have to go to the Iraqi govt. website to obtain that report - because that report derives straight from the United Nations.

I wonder Nadia, if those organizations were to place blame on Saddam do you think they would be allowed to stay in Iraq?

Nadia I don't like the sanctions for the fact that Saddam has been able to use them to cause suffering to innocent Iraqis, which surprise, hurts the U.S. and helps him. After all if one can build hundreds of palaces surely one could build hospitals and food banks, no? Why would Saddam build palaces while his people suffer, why do you think he would do such a thing Nadia?

“It’s just released revised predictions on the impact of a war which put the number of Iraqi people who will be in need of immediate food assistance once the fighting starts at 10,000,000.”

UN : Humanitarian disaster looms in Iraq](The World Today - ABC listen) ABC News, Australia

The World Today - Friday, February 14, 2003 12:15

ELEANOR HALL: Well, as the divisions continue, the United Nations is warning it’s not even close to being prepared for the humanitarian crisis that will inevitably follow war in Iraq. It’s just released revised predictions on the impact of a war which put the number of Iraqi people who will be in need of immediate food assistance once the fighting starts at 10,000,000.

At the moment the UN has food stocks for only 250,000 people. And then there’s the problem of access to water. Twelve years of sanctions have already seen at least 5,000,000 Iraqis denied access to safe water and sanitation. And the UN predicts those figures will double if critical infrastructure is damaged again.

David Laughlin-Carr is a senior humanitarian officer at the United Nations headquarters in New York and he’s been speaking to Tanya Nolan.

DAVID LAUGHLIN-CARR: It’s almost incredible that 60 percent of the population rely solely on the food basket provided by the, the Oil for Food program. So if it was disrupted, there could be an expectation that 60 percent of the population, that’s definitely more than 10,000,000 people could in fact be, be rendered vulnerable. And basically we would have to provide the food assistance for them, during and immediately after a conflict.

TANYA NOLAN: How is it that the United Nations Oil for Food program has proven to be so woefully inadequate to meet the needs of the Iraqi people?

DAVID LAUGHLIN-CARR: We do not manage the Oil for Food program ourselves. I think most people accept that in fact it basically has been mandated by the Security Council to provide a certain amount of food for the sale of Iraqi oil and for humanitarian assistance in the country.

In fact, I, I think the vulnerability has in fact improved of the population, over the, since it was introduced in 1998. At that time it was an extremely critical situation.

I won’t deny that people are living on the edge. It’s a very delicate balance. If the, if the pipeline was interrupted, then people would very quickly become basically and in a situation where they would need immediate food assistance.

TANYA NOLAN: The water supply, the supply of fresh water to Iraqis, is already very precarious. How much worse do you envisage that situation to be if there is a war?

DAVID LAUGHLIN-CARR: The water sector is considered absolutely critical, particularly in a case like Iraq with two river systems running down the middle where people basically dependent on that. And destruction of, of power stations themselves would in fact place the, the purification, treatment plants in jeopardy making people basically in need for immediate provision of food, of, of water assistance. This is, this’ll be very critical because as you know water is not easy to transport. It’s extremely heavy. And it’s a, it’s a big cost item on, on any agency’s budget.

TANYA NOLAN: Your emergency relief coordinator has also conceded that the United Nations has no capacity to respond to a chemical or biological attack, and that your workers will not be able to go into a contaminated site.

Do you agree that the United Nations really isn’t prepared for the humanitarian fall-out of a war in Iraq?

DAVID LAUGHLIN-CARR: It’s a tough question. Of course, it’s almost unprecedented to imagine that there may be a humanitarian crisis where we have to deal with [inaudible] problems. The UN system really has not got the capacity to provide anything other than technical expertise to the member states in the event that weapons would be used.

Our line is that, you know, basically at this stage, UN staff would not be able to operate in, in any environment that may be contaminated. And we would have to rely on member states themselves to assist the nations that would become [inaudible] inaccessible to us. And to provide an environment in which, an enabling environment in which we can operate.

ELEANOR HALL: David Laughlin-Carr is a humanitarian officer at the United Nations and he was speaking to Tanya Nolan.

UTD, First can i ask what you made of that United Nations report? What are your thoughts regarding it? Did you find any instances of where the author placed responsiblity upon the government of Iraq for not ordering sufficient human. supplies?

The report was prepared by Marc Bossuyt, in Belgium, not in Iraq. So the argument that, he had to state all this because he was residing in Iraq, is moot. It doesn't apply. He wasn't living in Iraq when he wrote this report. He was/is residing in Belgium.

i am still waiting for an independent, non government-affiliated source to back up the earlier claim (regarding not purchasing sufficient supplies).

Nadia I agree with point 49 in full...

  1. The case of Iraq by itself points to serious problems in the traditional theory of economic sanctions. In regimes where political decision-making is not democratic, there is simply no pathway through which civilian pressure can bring about change in the Government. In addition, civilian hardship can easily be translated into political advantage by a ruling regime. The targeted Government, especially if it has a strong grip on the media, will push its citizens to unite behind it in defiance of the foreign States. Sanctions can be used by the targeted Government as a scapegoat for its problems and give leaders fuel for political extremism.

I will pull up a UN article backingwhat I posted earlier.

Too Few Supplies Ordered, UN Official Says…

http://www.unfoundation.org/unwire/archives/UNWIRE010118.asp#12

When Millions of Iraqi civilians are forced to live in some of the worst living conditions caused by the most draconian sanctions implemented anywhere in the world, im really disgusted seeing the pro-war lobbies trying to defend their implementation and than placing all blame for their suffering on the Iraqi Government. What people should realise is that the sanctions have led to the destruction of the Iraqi civilian infrastructure so much so that up to 10 Million Iraqis have been forced to live off UN food baskets. Many thousands of Iraqi civilians have already died due to malnutrition, water bourne diseases, cancer, cholera, typhoid and polio. What we should be asking the po-war supporters is that do they not agree that thousands of these deaths could of been avoided if Iraq had been allowed to import medical supplies, medical equipment, essential foods, be allowed to repair their electricity and water plants by importing equipments and raw materials., be allowed to import essential agricultural products, Dont they agree that sanctions have led to the deaths of thousands of children :( , Dont they agree that sanctions have reduced life expectancy in Iraq towards the low end of the UN tables. Above all Dont they agree that another war against Iraq could absolutely devastate the country, Millions could die from hunger and disease. In fact the UN has projected that there could be up to 1/2 million Iraqi civilian casualties in the early stages of war. :(

The Iraqi People DESERVE PEACE. Long may PEACE PREVAIL.

Whether it be famines, sanctions, or any other limitations on financial and other resources. The problem is the mis-handling of the local gov'ts not the bodies providing aid orenforcing UN sanctions.

CH, the problem has always been with the evil sanctions which were supposed to hurt Sadams regime, instead they hurt millions of ordinary Iraqis. The Bush Administration isnt that dumb that they did not envisage what effects sanctions would have on the civilian population. Since their inception subsequent Adminstrations have continued their implementation despite almost every nation on Earth calling for their removal. At the end of the day its the policies of previous Administrations including that of Bush Senior, that are primarily responsible for the Humanitarian disaster that Iraqi civilians are facing today.

Post after post, thread after thread, paste after paste, accustation after accustation, condemnation after condemnation of the US and the US alone for the problems the Iraqis suffer are biased, myopic and illogical. If occasionally these rants put a tiny little bit of the blame on Saddam, they would perhaps be a little bit more stomachable.

If one or 2 of the thousands of the signs during “peace” rallies read “Saddam Stop the Killing” or “We Need Food, Not Palaces!”, these complaints of the Evil US might not ring so hollow in the halls of power. Bush laid out quite a case in front of the League of Nations that initiated this final battle that resulted in UN Resolution 1441 that was passed unaminously by the Security council.

His speech should have made it clear that by March 1st Saddam MUST comply with the promises he has broken for the past 12 years OR ELSE. What guess what? He hasn’t and it’s time for the OR ELSE, France Russia and China be damned for their insincere and equally selfish protests of more time.

Anyway, Bush’s speech says it all. Please correct his mistatements in the text below. If only 1/4 of what he says is true, Iraq has lied its way into a corner. He lost the war, he made promises and the Iraqi people have paid the price.

President’s Remarks at the United Nations General Assembly

Twelve years ago, Iraq invaded Kuwait without provocation. And the regime’s forces were poised to continue their march to seize other countries and their resources. Had Saddam Hussein been appeased instead of stopped, he would have endangered the peace and stability of the world. Yet this aggression was stopped – by the might of coalition forces and the will of the United Nations.

To suspend hostilities, to spare himself, Iraq’s dictator accepted a series of commitments. The terms were clear, to him and to all. And he agreed to prove he is complying with every one of those obligations.
He has proven instead only his contempt for the United Nations, and for all his pledges. By breaking every pledge – by his deceptions, and by his cruelties – Saddam Hussein has made the case against himself.

**In 1991, Security Council Resolution 688 demanded that the Iraqi regime cease at once the repression of its own people. including the systematic repression of minorities – which the Council said, threatened international peace and security in the region. This demand goes ignored.

Last year, the U.N. Commission on Human Rights found that Iraq continues to commit extremely grave violations of human rights, and that the regime’s repression is all pervasive.** Tens of thousands of political opponents and ordinary citizens have been subjected to arbitrary arrest and imprisonment, summary execution, and torture by beating and burning, electric shock, starvation, mutilation, and rape. Wives are tortured in front of their husbands, children in the presence of their parents – and all of these horrors concealed from the world by the apparatus of a totalitarian state.

In 1991, the U.N. Security Council, through Resolutions 686 and 687, demanded that Iraq return all prisoners from Kuwait and other lands. Iraq’s regime agreed. It broke its promise. Last year the Secretary General’s high-level coordinator for this issue reported that Kuwait, Saudi, Indian, Syrian, Lebanese, Iranian, Egyptian, Bahraini, and Omani nationals remain unaccounted for – more than 600 people. One American pilot is among them.

In 1991, the U.N. Security Council, through Resolution 687, demanded that Iraq renounce all involvement with terrorism, and permit no terrorist organizations to operate in Iraq. Iraq’s regime agreed. It broke this promise. In violation of Security Council Resolution 1373, Iraq continues to shelter and support terrorist organizations that direct violence against Iran, Israel, and Western governments. Iraqi dissidents abroad are targeted for murder. In 1993, Iraq attempted to assassinate the Emir of Kuwait and a former American President. Iraq’s government openly praised the attacks of September the 11th. And al Qaeda terrorists escaped from Afghanistan and are known to be in Iraq.

**In 1991, the Iraqi regime agreed to destroy and stop developing all weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles, and to prove to the world it has done so by complying with rigorous inspections. Iraq has broken every aspect of this fundamental pledge. **

From 1991 to 1995, the Iraqi regime said it had no biological weapons. After a senior official in its weapons program defected and exposed this lie, the regime admitted to producing tens of thousands of liters of anthrax and other deadly biological agents for use with Scud warheads, aerial bombs, and aircraft spray tanks. U.N. inspectors believe Iraq has produced two to four times the amount of biological agents it declared, and has failed to account for more than three metric tons of material that could be used to produce biological weapons. Right now, Iraq is expanding and improving facilities that were used for the production of biological weapons.

United Nations’ inspections also revealed that Iraq likely maintains stockpiles of VX, mustard and other chemical agents, and that the regime is rebuilding and expanding facilities capable of producing chemical weapons.

**And in 1995, after four years of deception, Iraq finally admitted it had a crash nuclear weapons program prior to the Gulf War. We know now, were it not for that war, the regime in Iraq would likely have possessed a nuclear weapon no later than 1993. **

Today, Iraq continues to withhold important information about its nuclear program – weapons design, procurement logs, experiment data, an accounting of nuclear materials and documentation of foreign assistance. Iraq employs capable nuclear scientists and technicians. It retains physical infrastructure needed to build a nuclear weapon. Iraq has made several attempts to buy high-strength aluminum tubes used to enrich uranium for a nuclear weapon. Should Iraq acquire fissile material, it would be able to build a nuclear weapon within a year. And Iraq’s state-controlled media has reported numerous meetings between Saddam Hussein and his nuclear scientists, leaving little doubt about his continued appetite for these weapons.

**Iraq also possesses a force of Scud-type missiles with ranges beyond the 150 kilometers permitted by the U.N. **Work at testing and production facilities shows that Iraq is building more long-range missiles that it can inflict mass death throughout the region.

**In 1990, after Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait, the world imposed economic sanctions on Iraq. Those sanctions were maintained after the war to compel the regime’s compliance with Security Council resolutions. In time, Iraq was allowed to use oil revenues to buy food. Saddam Hussein has subverted this program, working around the sanctions to buy missile technology and military materials. He blames the suffering of Iraq’s people on the United Nations, even as he uses his oil wealth to build lavish palaces for himself, and to buy arms for his country. By refusing to comply with his own agreements, he bears full guilt for the hunger and misery of innocent Iraqi citizens.

In 1991, Iraq promised U.N. inspectors immediate and unrestricted access to verify Iraq’s commitment to rid itself of weapons of mass destruction and long-range missiles. Iraq broke this promise, spending seven years deceiving, evading, and harassing U.N. inspectors before ceasing cooperation entirely. Just months after the 1991 cease-fire, the Security Council twice renewed its demand that the Iraqi regime cooperate fully with inspectors, condemning Iraq’s serious violations of its obligations. The Security Council again renewed that demand in 1994, and twice more in 1996, deploring Iraq’s clear violations of its obligations. The Security Council renewed its demand three more times in 1997, citing flagrant violations; and three more times in 1998, calling Iraq’s behavior totally unacceptable. And in 1999, the demand was renewed yet again… **

As we meet today, it’s been almost four years since the last U.N. inspectors set foot in Iraq, four years for the Iraqi regime to plan, and to build, and to test behind the cloak of secrecy.

**We know that Saddam Hussein pursued weapons of mass murder even when inspectors were in his country. Are we to assume that he stopped when they left? The history, the logic, and the facts lead to one conclusion: Saddam Hussein’s regime is a grave and gathering danger. To suggest otherwise is to hope against the evidence. To assume this regime’s good faith is to bet the lives of millions and the peace of the world in a reckless gamble. And this is a risk we must not take. **

Delegates to the General Assembly, we have been more than patient. We’ve tried sanctions. We’ve tried the carrot of oil for food, and the stick of coalition military strikes. But Saddam Hussein has defied all these efforts and continues to develop weapons of mass destruction. The first time we may be completely certain he has a – nuclear weapons is when, God forbids, he uses one. We owe it to all our citizens to do everything in our power to prevent that day from coming…

UTD, sorry for the delay. Feeling too tired to dig up the refs., if you don’t mind i will reply (in detail) to your post tomorrow.