Too many names to remember with Scotland Ireland Zimbabwe Bangladesh Afghanistan. They should be banned from cluttering our memory bank. Or we should give negative interest like the Swiss for them to have the honor to use space in our memory bank.
Anyhow, your comment shows that you never played cricket in your life. Actually, during my college days, we used to play limited overs cricket (30 overs a side ... sometime even 25 overs a side), and if we find any opponents' batsman was tuk-tuka than we used to make sure he stays on wicket and consume balls without scoring, and most of the time this was effective too.
IT shows how much you really know about cricket. Regardless of strike rate, you want to take wickets but keep on posting garbage comments.
Congratulation to Zimbabwe. Crucial breakthrough for Zimbabwe came when Zimbabwe got (or lost) the wicket of Chakabva. If Chakabv did not fell on his wicket and managed to stay playing than it would have been unlikely that Zimbabwe would have won this game.
IT shows how much you really know about cricket. Regardless of strike rate, you want to take wickets but keep on posting garbage comments.
Don't be shy and accept that you have never played cricket, :)
Too many names to remember with Scotland Ireland Zimbabwe Bangladesh Afghanistan. They should be banned from cluttering our memory bank. Or we should give negative interest like the Swiss for them to have the honor to use space in our memory bank.
Just remember Taylor..there seems to be one in almost every team.
Any Associate team, who have not played 100 ODI during the 4 years shouldn't be allowed for the worldcup match... it is time wasting and embracing for the teams and their home crowd and would not do any good for cricket.