The paraffin based (U.S' standard) jet fuel (Jet A) has a maximum burning temperature of 980°C. The long/structural steel used in constructing buildings, with 2.14% carbon, reaches its critical point at 1130°C. The 100% pure iron (free of carbon) reaches its critical point at 1500°C.
Conclusion: jet fuel, if burned to its maximum temperature, is unable to melt or even tamper structural steel.
It was the buckling of the concrete floors that initiated the collapse of the buildings. The steel didn't have to melt from the fire alone.
And what triggered this buckling of the concrete floors, may I ask? If the answer is the crash of the plane, then why the delay in between? The towers were standing still when the planes hit.
The paraffin based (U.S' standard) jet fuel (Jet A) has a maximum burning temperature of 980°C. The long/structural steel used in constructing buildings, with 2.14% carbon, reaches its critical point at 1130°C. The 100% pure iron (free of carbon) reaches its critical point at 1500°C.
Conclusion: jet fuel, if burned to its maximum temperature, is unable to melt or even tamper structural steel.
Not quite. You will find even 500°C will cause MAJOR structural damage. Like I said read and review the research by British Steel which promoted fire insulation at the WTC and other similar buildings.
And what triggered this buckling of the concrete floors, may I ask? If the answer is the crash of the plane, then why the delay in between? The towers were standing still when the planes hit.
Fire weekend the steel structure, enough for a floor to collapse. This falls on the floor below. Enough to bring that floor down and it goes on. It was a domino effect.
Fire weekend the steel structure, enough for a floor to collapse. This falls on the floor below. Enough to bring that floor down and it goes on. It was a domino effect.
I suggest in the Interest of putting this story to rest and as a service to all Humanity, someone should duplicate this disaster on a lessor scale, like build a Tower of Steel same as Twin Towers but smaller say only quarter scale then hit it with a tank full of Jet Fuel, and see if the steel burns to the point of collapse.
There is too much evidence pointing towards controlled demolition.. any experts want to take this as their PHd thesis??
I suggest in the Interest of putting this story to rest and as a service to all Humanity, someone should duplicate this disaster on a lessor scale, like build a Tower of Steel same as Twin Towers but smaller say only quarter scale then hit it with a tank full of Jet Fuel, and see if the steel burns to the point of collapse.
There is too much evidence pointing towards controlled demolition.. any experts want to take this as their PHd thesis??
The whole plane disappeared in the building, it didn't "explode" on the impact so there is on chance any object would fly out safely and land few blocks down the road.
I'll presume you meant "no chance" instead of "on chance".
All I can say is you are GUESSING, not got any proof to back up your science conclusion. Like mr 900 C has no effect on steel don't second guess.
At the moment of impact the plane nose broke, in a pressurised cabin it would not surprise me the pressure of impact could either send shock waves which blew out windows or doors. Luggae could fly out gaps.
Another possible scenario is the impact sent some luggage flying towards the front at high speed. Fuel is stored in the wings. Impact could accelerate luggae, be it in overhead compartment or loose out towards the front. With the forces involved could quit easily make it's way out.
The above are guesses and not hard facts. If you can PROVE luggage did not leave the plane I am all ears.
^ If ANY other luggage of some other passenger was found then your theory had some validity.... until then its just a theory cooked up to defend an absurd claim.
At the moment of impact the plane nose broke, in a pressurised cabin it would not surprise me the pressure of impact could either send shock waves which blew out windows or doors. Luggae could fly out gaps.
Another possible scenario is the impact sent some luggage flying towards the front at high speed. Fuel is stored in the wings. Impact could accelerate luggae, be it in overhead compartment or loose out towards the front. With the forces involved could quit easily make it's way out.
Have you really seen video footages that "may" put any credibility to your theory? All the videos I have seen show planes entering the buildings undamaged while the buildings' structure got damaged then the planes exploded.
I dont even know of ANY luggage was found. Your facts may well be absured for all I know. The matter is you can not prove otherwise. So stop making bull **** theories as facts.
Have you really seen video footages that "may" put any credibility to your theory? All the videos I have seen show planes entering the buildings undamaged while the buildings' structure got damaged then the planes exploded.
So you are saying the nose of a plane entered the building and remianed in one piece? you obviously have not read any reports on the collision.
Earlier you said no explosion occurred? so what did happen. Maybe you can enlighten us all.