Such was conventional wisdom on these pages, and media when he was named.
Note the identity of these posters, I doubt any of them would have a vested interest in overstating his creds.
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showpost.php?p=5488120&postcount=47
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showthread.php?t=270023
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showpost.php?p=5348266&postcount=16
http://www.paklinks.com/gs/showthread.php?t=265543
Try reading what I write when responding. How is this remotely related to the text you are quoting? I speak of the army’s reluctance, as an institution, to wean itself off power, and you speak of Bush’s desire for democracy?
US senators coming and “forcing” PPP to do anything is not what we disagreed about. It was whether there is a fundamental difference between democrats and republicans about Musharraf, and whether this is limited, as you said before, to Bush and his republican kabeenah.
Neither Bob Casey, nor Carl Levin are republicans. They are prominent democrats, who shape democratic foreign policy (Levin is the head of Senate Committe on Armed Services). Previous visits where it was alleged that US is pressuring pakistani politicians to stick with Mush also had prominent democrat politicians like Kerry/Biden/Harry Reid.