Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
perhaps you fail to notice, but Che Guu was talking about goverment sponsored pogroms. pak army massacring bengalis by the hundred thousands was exactly that.
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Sure…300,000 in a few months…even the Nazis with all their resource and innovation did not operate with that much efficiency…Plus what about the 100,000 massacred in Kashmir…thats a more plausible figure then the 300K>…
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Bull$hit…the 10% figure constituted the minority figure for all of Pakistan…including East Pakistan with its huge bengali hindu population, contributing to the bulk of it…and after '71 split…the bengali hindus were taken out of the equation…
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Before making a claim consult your information with some history books or a scholar…or even a simple daily newspaper reader may tell you the reality of Bangladeshi minority %.
So, I repeat…
How did you successfully eliminate the minorities in Pakistan? (The minorities ratio was more than 10% of the total population of (West) Pakistan in 1950 and now it has come down to 2 %.)
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
The topic was 'why India did'nt finish off pakistan, when it had the upper hand".
After 1971 war, No Pakistani POW was ever tried for war crimes, no major concessions were asked for releasing the prisoners.
The whole decade thereafter, was of peaceful co existance with Pakistan.
As such, I believe that after the 1971 breakup of Pakistan, India wanted long term peace with Pakistan.
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
OK! So you repeat and repeat and repeat like a broken record. Why because you love to mix up statistics with politics and your Baha-Rat-i nationalism.
“Elimination of minorities” was done on state level and guess who ended up with more land and safe access to Kashmir? Your Baha-Rat!
You can jump up and down, and beat us with minority danda (stick) and that’s OK you got some points in post 1950 period of Pakistan. BTW get your facts corrected. The biggest decline in Pakistani minority was in 1947 and not in 1950s’. Only Bihar lost Muslim minority in the 50s when they took advantage of 17% quota in Pak’s Federal jobs.
However you are dead wrong when it comes to 1947 ethnic cleansing of Punjab, Delhi, and Karachi.
Bharati interior minister “Sardar Wllibh Bhai Patel” (I’m sure Anjaan, most Baha-Rat-is won’t know his full name) made sure that Delhi, the whole of East Punjab, and Bombay is cleansed of any worthwhile Muslims.
Without East Punjab, Bharat would have no access to Kashmir and the resulting control over Pakistan’s life line called “water”. How did Patel got to Kashmir? By kicking all the Muslims (except one tiny kingdom of Malwa) from East Punjab.
Muslims were close to 70% of East Punjab whereas most of the non-Muslims were concentrated in big cities of Lahore, Amratsar, Jalandher, Gujranwala, and Pindi. Businessmen took their wealth from Lahore, Gujranwala to Bharat, and the ones in Bombay, and Calcutta to Pakistan. Their wealth was sort of moveable.
However the biggest losers were the 70% Eastern Punjabis the Muslims, and less than 10% Western Punjabi’s the Sikh landowners. Their wealth was truly looted and snatched in 1947. You would know the value of land if you have ever owned land (I doubt it because most of Biharis are landless peasants).
So my dear Bharati, when you shout at the top of your lungs “Minority”, think about all the of lands east of Wahga and ask "Why there is no Punjabi Musalmaan in
All of Haryana, All of East Punjab, and All of Himachal? How come they went from 70% to 0% (not even 2%).
Kapeesh!
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Mangal Pandeyji, sorry Antibol……why are you shouting? Lack of arguments? Last time a patriot citizen of Pakistan asked me to pick up the data from 1970 instead of 1950. If I agree to calculate with you the data since 1947, what guarantee that you would not run to 1937? Or you will ask me who butchered whom in 1947. Why Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel and not Amitabh Bacchan to blame for ethnic cleansing?
OK, you must know that after 1950 Muslims near about did not migrate from India to Pakistan. Whereas, Hindus from (West) Pakistan are still migrating to India.
(do'nt tell anyone that some Muslim families also left Pakistan because they rejected to live in a theocratic state.)
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
We the citiens of Pakistan not being members of a democracy cant be held responsible for the actions of a govt that isnt voted in by the people… Indians on the other hand are guilty by the very fact that they c]vote these people into power and keep them there… So…
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Yeah, but that still doesnt excuse you of the murder of 2000 Musi]lims in 2002 and in 1992.. Also the Murder of 2000 Sikh during the sikh riots but why count them? Oh and also the whole Kashmir thing:)
Besides the only reasons Indians accpet their Muslim Population is if the keep their heads ducked and their mouths shut..
So, how accepting is India?
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Its ridiculous how you Indians have the gaul to speak of your nations accpetance of Muslims when just three years back you people slaughtered 2000 of thm in cold blood…
Its like denying you murderede someone when you have their blood all over you and the knife in your hand! Seriously, You people should shut up, because the world knows all to well what Indian acceptance is all about:rolleyes:
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
//Its ridiculous how you Indians have the gaul to speak of your nations accpetance of Muslims when just three years back you people slaughtered 2000 of thm in cold blood...
Its like denying you murderede someone when you have their blood all over you and the knife in your hand! Seriously, You people should shut up, because the world knows all to well what Indian acceptance is all about//
Exception is not an example. A sad thing has happened and almost every right thinking Indian hangs his head in shame for the same. Can the same be said about the systematic abuse heaped on the minorities in Pakistan. True you might not have control on who governs you, but still you can stand for what is right rather than be a cyber jehadi.
The richest Indian is a muslim. You must think that he is a poster boy. Why do we need a poster boy to be the richest. India is a country where every person can rise up to any position if he has the capability to do so.
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Dear Pakpatriot....please donot underestimate Indian Muslim's bravery. India is the only country where a minority section can start riots and can have upper hand in killing the people from majority community.
Please pick up the record of UP and Bihar. Next time dont mention Bombay because muslims came out in open to retaliate for a disputed structure, nothing, just killed some Hindus and attacked their property.
Can you imagine a Godhra, Beslan or Nord-Ost type of incident in an Islamic State. Off course minorities in these states, if they exist, cannot think of such thing even in sleep.
Frankly speaking we have to learn a lot from your Islamic states, 'how to deal with the minorities.'
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
PakPatriot.....Muslims have no right to talk for Sikhs. Sikh community has not pardoned them for all atrocities they had to bear during Muslim rule. They still remind of all such incidents to their newborns in Gurudwaras.
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
That Muslim is an Agha Khani. Most Muslims don’t consider Agha Khanis to be Muslim.
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
May be you are practicing the “wrong” kind of islam. Jinnah (Mr. poonja) was a khoja..his grand father was a hindu-bania from Junagarh..Allama Iqbal (Mr. Sapru) was a kashmiri brahmin/pandit…ahhhhhhhh…the irony…
Re: Why India did’nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
FYI! 1947 is the year of Birth of Bharat. Why do you want to head towards 1937?
East Punjab (Current East Punjab, Haryana, and Himachal) was 70% Muslim. Now it is 0%. OK 0.00025% due to some Bihari laborers.
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Interesting thread. I'll contribute later. They keep on piling up arms, latest in technology, but get scared with "one" single missile test from Pakistan or any single advancement Pakistan makes. Referring to your original question, why they didn't attack Pakistan, well, in fact they were accumulating arms at that time hich they are doing till today, but they have not been able to accumulate enough arms because everytime, Pakistan creates deterrence for them, whhich prompts them to procure more arms. Even now, the balance of armies is approx 1:2 yet they are .............. no comments .......:D
I'll add later :p
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
At last I do not understand why Pakis are so interested in getting nuked. Is life a burden?
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Why is it so difficult for Pakistanis to believe that mainstream India has no interest whatsover "finishing of" or annexing pakistan?
Must be because they need an excuse and an enemy to hide internal problems with
Re: Why India did'nt finish off Pakistan in 1974
Yeah, I was wondering why China did'nt finish off India in 1962 and why Pakis did not cross the LOC... yeah! why!