Re: Why do Pakistanis act objectively but not the Indians?
Yes and No. When I joined in Afghanistan the guy on the interview panel was an Indian who took a strong objection to hiring a Pakistani. Said so in the report. My boss hired me anyway.
On the other hand the guy I lived with for three years is an Indian from Indore. Myself, he and our Nepali colleague spent many hours in bunkers, dealing with complex attacks and so much more.
What matters is the type of person and not the nationality. Acting Professionally is not a nation based thing. Its a personal thing.
Re: Why do Pakistanis act objectively but not the Indians?
Many Indians and Pakistanis have way to much baggage, negotiate on every turn, and are generally not easy deal with in terms of business. Note that I said many. My old firm repeatedly passed on Indian firms (Pakistani firms didn’t even make the short list) as clients. In general, South Asians don’t have a the best reputation in the business world.
Now that I have my own shop, I have been a lot more open to doing business with like minded people. Ironically the Gujaratis (Indian/Pakistani) have been the easiest to work with. I think it might have something to do with the business acumen, the fact that they are expats (America, Canada, East Africa), and have a long term vision.
Re: Why do Pakistanis act objectively but not the Indians?
I found south indians to be very seedha saadha and humble, but very academic and technical. They may grill you to death in a technical interview, but that is because they are being objective. Interview is like an exam for them. If you pass, you pass and you get a job. That is it.
Re: Why do Pakistanis act objectively but not the Indians?
seedha saadha and humble?
Anyways, the question is if anyone disagree that when an Indian gets a high position, more Indians get hired in same department or company while this is not the usual case when Pakistanis get higher position of hiring other people?
It is not about regional differences in Pakistanis or Indians.
