Why are Muslims against Evolution?!?

[yazdi]

Re: Why are Muslims against Evolution?!?

@psyah

Peace yazdi

You have a habit of summing up my position erroneously … I can say that about 50% of that above is wrong … yet again …

My stance has not changed from the beginning but I admit my knowledge in the subject has increased and the more I delve the more it will increase … but it doesn’t mean that my position has changed … rather your understanding of my position has improved but it is obviously still not perfect …

Please let me define my position and you define your position on this matter … Evolution the more you delve the more you realise it is incomplete and new theories are needed to explain the matter further … but no one asks the question … perhaps the basic idea of evolution is flawed and hence wrong …

I say this without any arrogance but I believe you are unable to see the pointers that add to the idea that evolution theory might be flawed … if you see them then admit it … lets have something from you shall we … do you believe Creation is possible? Do you believe that the fossil record can just as easily explain creation as it can evolution?

Don’t you agree that the complicated errors that keep popping up on the basis of evolution will not come up if one admits to a creation model instead? Would you agree that to find truth one must look to resolution of problems and conflicts rather than what they would like to be “right” ???

These are critical questions the answers of which make me sceptical about evolution and favour Creation.

I fully agree with you that you should define your own position. My frustration is you are not doing it. You selectively answer the questions raised according to your convenience and the purposely avoid where you have no explanation.. for example point (4).. I have asked you at least 7 times to explain your previous and present position.. but you conveniently avoided to touch that point. It’s not about point (4) only.. please explain your position from point (1) to point (7).. and clarify your present position once for all.. instead of just accusing me that I got it all wrong without giving any reason to your notion.. show me where I am 50% wrong about your current position..
If I got your position wrong.. please explain what is your position in your own words because you have the habit of conveniently skipping the points raised.

In fact … I just want one answer … please explain to me how 24 chromosomes of our nearest cousins became 23 in us in the light of genetic drift.

I already answered it.. you don’t read carefully..

1. I don’t trust the article. I requested you to back the source from some reputed science exploring/educational web site with some credentials. The article does not show where and how this study was conducted.. who verified the results.. how widely this study is accepted..

2. Even if the study is credible (which I doubt).. It shows the genetic drift between humans and chimpanzees is more than it was previously assumed. 23 or 24 chromosomes can indicate this wider drift which caused this speciation. How does it negate the idea of evolution from common ancestors.. what do you really want to prove from this unverifiable study.. I really fail to understand… HUH

Regarding your question about creationism..

1. Don’t try to fool the readers that it is a religious idea.. it is the interpretation of certain literal religionist from a particular branch of religious understandings. (Vatican church, Arch Bishop of Canterbury, and a lot of muslims religious scholars are not a part of this particular branch).. Don’t equate them with science or science of evolutionary biology.. there is too much observed evidence against these history deniers of various degrees some of whom still believe that universe is geocentric, and human beings and all the life forms just arrived from somewhere less than 10,000 years ago (after the agriculture revolution).. some of the sophisticated type, and I suspect you are one of them, believe in Noah’s flood which occurred less than last 100.000 years.. certainly after the arrival of human beings which can not be more than 100,000 years tops.. which is conclusively proven to be wrong by scientific observations.. there was no global flood in the recent geological history of our planet. More rationale non literal religious followers believe in a regional flood… contrary to these history deniers.. the literal religionist..!!!

2. You see pointers that evolutionary biology is wrong.. nobel laureates are wrong.. MIT, Harvard, Oxford are wrong.. show me those pointers..
   You can get next nobel prize if you can show those pointers..

Read this to find out why all the reputable educational institutions consider evolutionary biology as valid science:

29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent —...

P.S.
Harvard.edu uses this link to answer the validity of evolutionary biology as a valid science.. something you should know to determine the authenticity of the contents of this web site.. unlike the unverifiable propagandist link you have posted..