Ok .. Now you have admitted to the changing/different life forms../more complex life forms with passing geological times.. we can move on with the discussion.. (I have used word “Different” in my previous posts also.. but I began to feel that you unnecessarily began to beat the bush to avoid the discussion to go any further)..
Now let me come straight to the point where I find problem with the attitude of literal religionist like you..
I always presented evolution as a probability, possibility never as a conclusive reality. When we know the changing life forms we try to explore the reasons for these changing life forms with scientific explanations. By far evolution is the best possible answer put forward by humans to explain these changing life forms in geological times. The problem with you is when you accept evolution is a possibility.. You have to accept that species superior to humans are possible in future. This is against your literal scripture belief… Thus because of your short coming as a literal religionist you can not pursue scientific investigation with an open mind. Your example is of a detective investigating a murder who has already made up his mind.. and would not like to study any forensic/superficial/testimonial evidence except what will reconcile with his already pre assumed position. By the way theoretically speaking we can achieve improvements in human anatomy by artificial selection of genes in a very short span of time with present day technologies available to us.. while evolution uses natural selection to achieve these changes… if these anatomical changes are achievable in a very short time using artificial selection.. why bigger changes are not possible when nature uses natural selection in a very long geological time span.. It will be very foolish to discount it as no possibility for any science student… unless someone is pursuing some fixed agenda..