Peace chacha_Ghalib
This is farther from the truth one could possibly imagine.
Evolution is a theory … the evolution fact is a different ‘evolution’
The statement “evolution is both a theory and a fact” is often seen in biological literature.[1]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia)[2]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia)[3]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia)[4]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia)[5]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia)[4]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia)[6]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia)[7]](Evolution as fact and theory - Wikipedia) This statement arises because evolution is used in two ways. In short, the word is ambiguous. The “fact of evolution” refers to the changes in populations of biological organisms over time, which are known to have occurred through scientific observations and experiments. The “theory of evolution” refers to the modern evolutionary synthesis, which is the current scientific explanation of how these changes occur. Misuse and misunderstanding of these terms have been used to construct arguments disputing the validity of the theory of evolution.
Obviously written by pro-evolutionists …
The changes in populations of biological organisms over time, an example of this would refer to the coming of white man as a result of moving to colder climates. However, this change takes place over a few thousand years instead of millions of years. To date no one has proven evolution extends beyond the genus of an organism. It is testable that within species there is cross-genus procreation but this is often one or two generation and the lineage stops. Evolution meant in the sense of modern evolutionary synthesis is still a theory. The validity of observed intra-species evolution is not going to be the same as the validity of the theory that attempts to explain all life.
We did not come from apes, we are apes physically that is, but our souls are what make us human.