Re: Which one is the oldest langauge on earth?
when Allah created Adam (as), He taught him how to speak and taught him words....
so whatever language that was, it wud be the oldest.....
since many ppl say that Adam's (as) first abode on earth was in the indian sub-continent so perhaps sanskrit cud be the language....
Re: Which one is the oldest langauge on earth?
obviously many of us believe that animals which were living here long before humans set foot on this planet had no ‘language’. 
Re: Which one is the oldest langauge on earth?
***When did Pakistan came to existence ?. ***
***Influence of Bharatvarsh or Ancient India was in far flung continents. ***
How many Pakistanis know this language ??
***There is no category as Aryans ? It is a term coined by Europeans who always showed eastern societies in poor light. History is a propaganda of Victors. Don’t forget that. ***
Entire Indus Valley civilisation is not in present day Pakistan.. a big part also lies in Rajasthan and Gujarat. Please set your historical bearings right.
Re: Which one is the oldest langauge on earth?
[quote]
When did Pakistan came to existence ?
[/quote]
One day before India.
Name change doesn’t mean history change. Pakistan might be a newer name than India but the words India and Hind haven’t always been applied to South Asia either, they were given by foreign invaders.
Pakistan wasn’t created to deny our South Asian identity, it was made because of our separate religion, we’re South Asian Muslims not Middle Easterners.
Most Pakistani languages are of Sanskritic origin, the fact that not many people in Pakistan can speak Sanskrit does not change its Pakistani origin. Pakistanis should reclaim their heritage, religion change doesn’t mean culture change, lot of nations embraced Islam yet kept their culture.
As for the Aryan theory, look mate nobody is going to buy your Hindutva propaganda so keep those lunatic websites to yourself, it’s amazing how much balooney the pundits can fill your heads with at them ashrams.
Maybe some aspects of the Aryan invasion theory are debatable but there is also a lot of truth to it, Aryan migrations/invasions to South Asia did happen and there is no solid evidence which disputes this fact, before the Aryans India was inhabited by Dravidian people and Aborigines before them, South Asia is an amalgam of different races because lots of different nations settled here and made it what it is today, none of them are foreigners anymore because they got assimilated into South Asia and we trace our heritage(s) from them all.
Just one thing, India should stop acting like the daddy by referring to Ancient South-Asia as Ancient India because all South Asian countries have equal claim to the history/identity of the South-Asian Subcontinent, if anything Pakistan has more rights because it is the cradle of the Indus Valley civilisations and the Vedic civilisations.
Re: Which one is the oldest langauge on earth?
Name change doesn’t mean history change. Pakistan might be a newer name than India but the words India and Hind haven’t always been applied to South Asia either, they were given by foreign invaders.
Pakistan wasn’t created to deny our South Asian identity, it was made because of our separate religion, we’re South Asian Muslims not Middle Easterners.
Most Pakistani languages are of Sanskritic origin, the fact that not many people in Pakistan can speak Sanskrit does not change its Pakistani origin. Pakistanis should reclaim their heritage, religion change doesn’t mean culture change, lot of nations embraced Islam yet kept their culture.
As for the Aryan theory, look mate nobody is going to buy your Hindutva propaganda so keep those lunatic websites to yourself, it’s amazing how much balooney the pundits can fill your heads with at them ashrams.
Maybe some aspects of the Aryan invasion theory are debatable but there is also a lot of truth to it, Aryan migrations/invasions to South Asia did happen and there is no solid evidence which disputes this fact, before the Aryans India was inhabited by Dravidian people and Aborigines before them, South Asia is an amalgam of different races because lots of different nations settled here and made it what it is today, none of them are foreigners anymore because they got assimilated into South Asia and we trace our heritage(s) from them all.
Just one thing, India should stop acting like the daddy by referring to Ancient South-Asia as Ancient India because all South Asian countries have equal claim to the history/identity of the South-Asian Subcontinent, if anything Pakistan has more rights because it is the cradle of the Indus Valley civilisations and the Vedic civilisations.
And what was this continent known before that ????