Re: What do you think about my signature (serious)
It is insulting, as the statement makes a point about sterility (homosexuality), vs. fertility (heterosexuality), and equating females with fertility, thereby making their importance solely based on their reproductive organs. It's not hard to see. Sexual intimacy between consenting adults has absolutely nothing to do with the status of either sex.
When you make any statement equating heterosexual sex with procreation and only that, you also make the statement that women are only worthy of such when they are fertile. In essence, it damns any woman who cannot fulfill the role as a baby machine, and demeans every woman to the role of a meat puppet.
Besides, it's homosexuality, not homosexualism.