Use of technology in decisions

[smooth_guy]

Re: Use of technology in decisions

@Raindance

Option # 2 is the only viable and non controversial sequence of actions resting with the 3rd umpire for the final verdict to render a player OUT or IN.

The available technology is already in place to facilitate a non controversial judging of ALL RULES upon an appeal during the live game.

**
However I wonder if 3 Match referees would be more appropriate instead of only one. 2 Match referees could be on venue site, and the 3rd one could be off shore hooked up via live video streaming. A unanimous decision of 3 MR’s can eliminate controversial decisions and also fulfilling the neutral umpire requirements. **

Option # 3 can create controvercies/embarassment and no reliability of certain umpires in the long run and may be un ethical to imply. Because this option requires to ‘over rule’ a decision and reversing of the verdict, it would not be reliable, problem free or without ill wills.

Why off-shore??? Lines Area mein match horaha hai kiya??? Match Refree ke kidnapp hone ka khatra hai?