US seeks Moussaoui case dismissal

By Ian Pannell
BBC correspondent in Washington

Lawyers for the US Government have asked a judge to dismiss all charges against a man accused of conspiring in the 11 September attacks.

Zacarias Moussaoui is the only person in the US to have been charged in connection with the plot.

The extraordinary request by prosecutors is a legal manoeuvre, designed to stop Mr Moussaoui’s access to other terrorist suspects.

It would not mean that he would be released from custody.

Zacarias Moussaoui admits to being a member of al-Qaeda, but denies being part of the 11 September plot.

To prove his case, he wants access to three high-level al-Qaeda prisoners who are being interrogated in secret locations by the US military.

Legal review

The judge who is supposed to hear the trial ordered that he should be allowed to interview the men because they may have information that could spare his life.

Mr Moussaoui faces the death penalty if he is found guilty of conspiring in the attacks.

The government has refused to comply with the ruling, leaving the judge with no alternative but to impose a punishment on prosecutors.

What government lawyers have now suggested is a clever legal move. They have called on the judge to throw the case out.

That doesn’t mean Zacarias Moussaoui would be set free; instead, prosecutors would then go straight to a higher court and appeal the dismissal and crucially, the original ruling that Mr Moussaoui should get access to the al-Qaeda detainees.

The judge must now decide on this move.

yeah.. so they can nab him as soon as he leaves the court and throw him in Gitmo without any trial or for that matter any charges filed.

^ sounds like a good plan to me...

^^ just something a good Stalinist would say :k:

Thats a weird rule.... that prosecutors request all charges to be dropped and once the request is accepted by the judge; then to appeal the verdict in another court. Duh!

Hopefully the judge will actually let justice run its course rather than dismiss the case, which would effectively deny a man access to evidence that could save his life.

"just something a good Stalinist would say"

Please enlighten me as to how that is a stalinist statement. The guy's an admitted member of Al Qaeda that received terrorist training under OBL in afghanistan. The US is his declared enemy. Do you think he came to the US to see the grand canyon and disneyland?

Gitmo is probably to good for this fu**er.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Stu: *
....Do you think he came to the US to see the grand canyon and disneyland?...

[/QUOTE]

I forgot the beginning of this case, I thought he was arrested in Germany and extradited to US.

Edit: I just check and he was perhaps arrested in Oklahoma...

Wasn't it in France where he along with his family were at Disneyland Paris?

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Stu: *
The guy's an admitted member of Al Qaeda that received terrorist training under OBL in afghanistan. The US is his declared enemy. Do you think he came to the US to see the grand canyon and disneyland?
[/quote]

oh perhaps u can share this incriminating evidence wit Mullah Ashcroft cuz other than 'legal maneouvering' he doesn't appear to have much of a case against the accused..

Do the American courts actually know the meaning of the word EVIDENCE

I very much doubt it after events in recent years!

Update!
Moussaoui death penalty ruled out

**
A US federal judge has ruled that prosecutors may not seek the death penalty for the only person in the US charged over the 11 September attacks.

District Judge Leonie Brinkema did not agree to drop all charges against Zacarias Moussaoui - but she barred prosecutors from arguing that he had been involved in the attacks.
**
The prosecution of Mr Moussaoui has been dogged by a row over his request to interview other al-Qaeda suspects being held in US custody, who he says would prove his innocence.

The government has refused to allow him access to the detainees on grounds of national security, a fact that the judge said could prejudice his trial.

Mr Moussaoui, a 35-year-old French citizen of Moroccan origin, was indicted 21 months ago on four counts of conspiracy to commit terrorism, which carry the death penalty.

He had been under arrest on immigration charges when hijackers crashed civilian airliners into the World Trade Center and other targets, killing more than 2,800 people.
**
Judge Brinkema said government prosecutors could not argue that the defendant was involved in, or had knowledge of, planning the attacks.
**
She postponed the effect of her ruling so the government could appeal.
**
The BBC’s Jon Leyne in Washington says that even if Mr Moussaoui is cleared by the civilian court, he could still be turned over to a military one.
**

‘Simply unfair’

Mr Moussaoui and his court-appointed defence team had been seeking the full dismissal of the charges.

Ironically, the government had also asked for their dismissal, believing that this would be the quickest route to intervention by an appellate court.

Mr Moussaoui had been seeking to interview three major al-Qaeda suspects who are being held by the US at undisclosed locations:

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, alleged to be the 9/11 mastermind;

Ramzi Binalshibh, believed to be a key planner of the attacks;

Mustafa Ahmed al-Hawsawi, believed to be an al-Qaeda financier.
Judge Brinkema ruled on Thursday that the US authorities were denying the defendant the right to important witnesses.
**
“The United States may not maintain this capital prosecution while simultaneously refusing to produce witnesses who could, at a minimum, help the defendant avoid a sentence of death,” she wrote.

“It would simply be unfair to require Moussaoui to defend himself against such prejudicial accusations while being denied the ability to present testimony from witnesses who could assist him in contradicting those accusations.”
**
‘20th hijacker’

Prosecutors have argued that Mr Moussaoui’s actions mirror those of the 19 hijackers behind the 11 September attacks.

He went through flight instruction, is alleged to have received money from a terrorist suspect and is alleged to have been trained at an al-Qaeda camp.

However, the US authorities have not offered evidence of a direct link between Mr Moussaoui and the hijackings.

He has said in court that he provided a guest house for al-Qaeda members, but insisted that he was not involved in the attacks.

Mr Moussaoui told the court he was a member of al-Qaeda and had sworn a pledge of allegiance to Osama Bin Laden but he later withdrew the remarks.