Maliky, you're like a broken record, it's just the same song over and over again. I think it is you who have lost their temper this morning after you heard the news and your “Saddam escaping to India” theory was shoot to hell. :)
Hey Undie, If capturing Saddam is a success then God help you. None of your objectives will be met.
BTW here is a little price list for you.
Osama Bin Laden $24.99M
Mullah Omar $24M
For every thing else there is master card. 
Here is the list of your BS
- WMD
- Al-Qaeda links
- Liberation
- Rebuilding
You are only fooling yourself and no one else. BTW the death of Saddams or his sons aint gona a change anything. Same for OBL. You saw what happened after the death of his sons, terrorist in uniform were being eleminated every day. Do you think its gona a change now.
Stay tuned for good news (excluding your media spin) OH BTW don’t shed crocodile tears you low lives have killed millions in the east.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Maliky, you're like a broken record, it's just the same song over and over again.
[/QUOTE]
Has the Boston Globe lost the plot when it prints a story saying the US military has killed three times more people in Afghanistan and Iraq, than those killed in the WTC attacks?
No Malik, but once again inaction caused more to die, your logic is flawed due to this fact.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
Has the Boston Globe lost the plot when it prints a story saying the US military has killed three times more people in Afghanistan and Iraq, than those killed in the WTC attacks?
[/QUOTE]
US and kill or terrorism! Naaaaaaa it is a conspiracy.. LOL...
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
No Malik...
[/QUOTE]
Has the US military not killed at least three times as many civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq than those who were killed in the WTC attacks? Is the Boston Globe lying? Yes or No?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
Has the US military not killed at least three times as many civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq than those who were killed in the WTC attacks? Is the Boston Globe lying? Yes or No?
[/QUOTE]
You don't expect to get a straight answer do you..
Innocent people were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan; to many (1 is to many) does that mean that Saddam/Taliban should have been left in power. The answer is no as that would lead to even more suffering, but for you it's not about the Iraqi/Afghani people it’s about hating America.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Innocent people were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan; to many (1 is to many) does that mean that Saddam/Taliban should have been left in power.
[/quote]
Who's decision is that to make? Not the idiots in Washington, that's for sure. By that logic, any group out there has every right to take out Bush and his primate regime by any means (twin towers, pentagon, attempted whitehouse, etc, etc, etc.)
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
The answer is no as that would lead to even more suffering...
[/QUOTE]
So first you are saying that the US military has not killed at least three times as many people in Afghanistan and Iraq, as those who died in the WTC attacks. Then you are admitting they were killed, but only to stop them suffering?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
So first you are saying that the US military has not killed at least three times as many people in Afghanistan and Iraq, as those who died in the WTC attacks. Then you are admitting they were killed, but only to stop them suffering?
[/QUOTE]
Killing the innocent is a good way to put them out of their suffereings. LOL.. is that another yank logic..
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
So first you are saying that the US military has not killed at least three times as many people in Afghanistan and Iraq, as those who died in the WTC attacks. Then you are admitting they were killed, but only to stop them suffering?
[/QUOTE]
Learn to comprehend what you read and then we can discuss.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Abdali: *
Killing the innocent is a good way to put them out of their suffereings. LOL.. is that another yank logic..
[/QUOTE]
Jeez I know. They kill tens of thousands of innocent Afghan and Iraqi civilians, including little babies and children and here we have extremist American's saying that is only to stop people suffering.
No wonder the Taliban is roaming freely in Afghanistan now, and Iraqi's today want the American's to pack their bags fast and get out of their country.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
Jeez I know. They kill tens of thousands of innocent Afghan and Iraqi civilians, including little babies and children and here we have extremist American's saying that is only to stop people suffering.
No wonder the Taliban is roaming freely in Afghanistan now, and Iraqi's today want the American's to pack their bags fast and get out of their country.
[/QUOTE]
Malik, You are ranting about 10 of 1000s these low lives have killed millions. So what the hell, do you expect them to give a rats ass about innocent killed. Its Collateral damage... get it..
UTD: Please don't tell me the US invasion had anything to do with promoting democracy and removing dictators. If that was true, the US would have invaded God knows how many countries.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Zakk: *
UTD: Please don't tell me the US invasion had anything to do with promoting democracy and removing dictators. If that was true, the US would have invaded God knows how many countries.
[/QUOTE]
Zakk yaara, he thinks that the US military slaughtering tens of thousands of Afghans and Iraqi's was to ending to their suffering.
It's sad it took this many innocent Iraqi deaths before the true mission plan was revealed....the capture of one American stooge dictator.
Politics is a dirty game full of shame and murder the US does it so well.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Innocent people were killed in Iraq and Afghanistan; to many (1 is to many) does that mean that Saddam/Taliban should have been left in power. The answer is no as that would lead to even more suffering, but for you it's not about the Iraqi/Afghani people
[/QUOTE]
UTD, im glad you agree that the Bush adminstration is ultimately responsible for the killing of many innocent men, women and children by its forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
One must also remember that they have waged an illegal war against Iraq, they have blatantly ignored international laws and conventions, they have failed to maintain law and order within the country, they have failed to provide essential humanitarian needs for millions of Iraqis, they have SOLD out Iraqs economy illegally to US corporations many of which have direct links to the Bush Administration and have been involved with several corruption scandals.
Dil, the world FAILED the Iraqi people. The U.S. is responsible for saving countless Iraqi's! Save your illegal war bit for the Iraqi people who had to live under Saddam, who’s family members have disappeared in the middle of the night night, go tell them that removing Saddam was illegal.
UTD, Saddam was a tyrant and should of been taken out years ago by the Bush Adminstration.. but nope, he was left in place to serve US foreign policy within the region. Lets look at some facts about Iraq.. Hundreds of thousands died in the Iran-Iraq war which served US interests ie to stop the spread of the Iranian revolution also to subjugate Sadams regime, the US also turned a blind eye to thousands of shiaas killed in an uprising which initially had their support but later were left to be slaughtered, they also turned a blind eye to the gasing of thousands of kurds, they also were ultimately responsible for the deaths of up to 1.6 million Iraqis from their implementation of a draconian sanctions policy, which devastated the civilian infrastructure within Iraq... Oh and not forgetting the adminstrations illegal use of DU weapons which scientists have linked to the huge increase in cancer deaths within Southern Iraq, with hundreds of babies born with deformities.