Anectodically speaking, a friend of mine did his Civil Engg from UET (late 80's), got a gold medal, and got admission in MIT for Masters. He says that for the first year of the Masters, he really had to struggle very hard because the basic engineering foundations laid down by UET were so poor, and the difference in syllabii and teaching methods was enormous. However, at the end of the day, the guy ended up with real top honors from MIT as well, so I suspect it was more to do with the person's abilities than UET. He is now running a very successful computer consulting company in Pakistan and US. Few other UET grads I know, did their Masters from US and are now working for Sun, Intel, Cisco and other top companies. And are doing really well.
Well with all due respect Faisal, I have not met any UETian who struggled at a USA institution due to poor undergraduate education….Not that I am trying to discredit your claim but a situation like that is definitely more of an exception than the rule (and yes you did recognize this point in your post....so shame on me for picking on your statement!)
To the original poster, let me give you an example of my session. I am an ex-UETian and over 80 students from my batch came to US/Europe for MS/Phds. Most of them went to top US/Canadian/European/Asian schools (Oxford, Delft, Tsinghua, Seoul National, Austin, Urbana, Georgia Tech, Madison, Stanford, Imperial, Karlshrue, Purdue, Cambridge, Minnesota, Toronto, McGill, Alberta, Ann Arbor, Kyoto etc) and I don’t recall anyone facing academic problems. Almost all of us had graduate research or teaching assistantships. Most of them went on to work for big engineering and Fortune-500 companies (Microsoft, Sun, Intel, Kraft, Exxon, Cisco, Schlumberger, Yahoo, Bechtel, URS, AMEC etc).
Yes, adjusting from an annual system to a fast-paced semester system used to be a challenge but that particular problem does not exist anymore as UET’s academic system has been switched to the semester system. My personal academic experience at US encompassed attending an engineering school (top 20 in my engineering major), Chicago and an Ivy League institution for a full-time MBA and by grace of Allah, I always earned a spot on the dean’s list. And I do owe it to the quantitative rigor that I went through at UET-Lahore and GC-Lahore (proud Old Ravian!). Two of my friends were able to take credit (partial) for their UET course work at Austin but it varies from one school to other.
Now let me tell you one thing and I am 100% sure about this. Whether you go to LUMS, NUST, GIK or UET, it won’t make a big difference as far as credit transfer to US institutions is concerned. As I said before, it will vary from one US school to other. All of them are good accredited Pakistani Universities and you will have no problem getting admission to good US schools for MS/MBA/Phd (as long as you were a top student) but none of them have any sort of clout among US institutions. The only institution that has a clout among US institutions is IIT from India. PERIOD. So guys, please stop this baseless discussion of NUST vs GIK vs UET vs XYZ. And please don’t quote one-time events…..we are talking about widespread perception not anecdotal evidences.
UET-Lahore has by far the largest and most accomplished engineering alumni base (from Pakistan) in North America. And it is not surprising. From 1947 to 1997, it enjoyed the reputation of best engineering school in the country and every top student after his/her FSC used to come here. Yes, the school faced strikes and riots in 80s but it is not a reflection of UET’s academic standards. It was due to Zia’s turbulent period and every institution in the country including medical schools faced the same predicament during that period.