Pretty clear!! I havent seen what you wrote is clear. August 15 nawab hands over the state, within 20 days Pakistan accepts it. Pakistan went to UN complaining about Indias military action and does not recognize the plebiscite.
Considering the fact that most instruments of accession were accepted by India/Pakistan within a day or two (J&K included), a month long delay (Pakistan accepted on Sept 13, 1947) is indeed a sign of reluctance. If that's not enough, there's also the fact that Liaquat Ali Khan and the Government of Pakistan agreed to settle the state's final status by referendum...India, acting in bad faith as always, decided it couldn't wait and invaded the state.
You are sensationalising the people who are killed. Hence I asked you what happened to the Hindus in POK.
Pointing out the context under which the Pathans invaded to Indians who apparently are in complete denial about the situation in the state hardly counts as "sensationalizing."
But rebelion was a direct result of hindu-muslim division. Mulsims at that point, you would also agree, were not fighting the Dogra army against independence rather than the urge to join their muslim brothers in Pak land. Hence such crimes have to be considered as the result of partition. Both Hindus and Muslims suffered, talking about numbers doesnt make sense.
The rebellion was actually began as a result of the Maharaja's oppressive taxation policies.
So that justifies Nizam having a pakistani as a prime minister and using his private army to intimidate and kill his subjects. This isnt equidistant.
Ummm...which PM was Pakistani? Mir Laik Ali was a native Hyderabadi businessman. As for "killing subjects"...I'm assuming you're talking about the Nizam's response to the Telangana Rebellion. If that's enough to justify an Indian invasion, then its *beyond hypocritical *(not that I'm surprised) of you to condemn any of Pakistan's actions in J&K. Not only did the Maharaja fire his Kashmiri PM at Gandhi's insistence, and replace him with a Punjabi Indian...but he also proceeded to use his personal army (and that of Patiala state) to massacre at least 200,000 of his subjects.