So you mean to say that the partition of India was not done by the british but it was decided by the punjabis and sindhis themselves.
Deny it all you want, Pakistan was created through a popular, democratic movement.
Interestingly there were close to 400 + princely states ....... so who decided for them , their legislative assemblies?
Unfortunately, no. But in all but 3 cases, the local rulers had the decency to sign over their states in accordance with the demographic realities and the will of the majority of the population. In two of the three exceptions (Hyderabad & Junagadh) India was all too happy to invade and hold a plebiscite so the will of the population could be carried out. Kashmir is pretty much the only princely state that was totally screwed over in the whole process.
What about now ... should the Balochs be allowed to leave Pakistan, hey no one asked them also in 1947 ?
Actually, in 1947, the Baloch tribes convened a grand jirga which ratified the state's accession to Pakistan.
I told you very simply that you are not the representative of anyone, so your use of 'we' is invalid.
There is no dearth of polls and surveys that show that a majority of us want independence. Get over it.
In the other thread titled "independent kashmir" you have admitted that your deep rooted wish for merger of kashmir with pakistan. So your charade as speaking for Kashmiris is pretty much over.
All I said was that most Kashmiris wanted to join Pakistan in the past, and that Pakistan wasted several opportunities to take over Kashmir while public sentiment was still in their favor. I know how much you & your countrymen enjoy living in denial when it comes to Kashmir and just how much the Kashmiri people hate Indian occupation, so I can see why my statement has you foaming at the mouth in rage.
And then you have also completely lost the script on history by refusing to learn about your own identity and the history of Kashmir.
Since you've very clearly demonstrated yourself to be far too ignorant to grasp the distinction between religious mythology and historical record, I'm not going to bother further belaboring the point.