Re: عمران خان بدکار ہے، عائشہ گلالئی
You mean, Altaf Hussain should not have got banned, as he still has more votes than NS? … as many believe if Pakistan had presidential form of election, where votes fall to individuals not party full of Electable, it is possible that Altaf Hussan might get more vote than Haramkhor Tharki NS.
How about Musharraf, why EC banned him for life and no party, neither you, started BS what you are saying after NS got banned for life?
Another fact of parliamentary election, especially in third world, is that, money wins election. If India spends $10 billion dollar on Pakistani election, Modi buying Electable and voters, would become PM as well as CM of all 4 provinces. So, your this belief is wrong.
Forget Modi, if Donnald Trump would form a party and would contest election in Pakistan, saying that if he wins, he would give every Pakistani between age 20 years and 40 years old, work visa of USA, than his party would win the election, and Donald Trump would become PM of Pakistan. But obviously, Pakistani law would not allow that, regardless of number of votes Donald Trump gets.
Right is that … different state departments, police, FIA and court work on candidates and only allow those candidate to contest election who is eligible to contest .. or let them stay in office as long as they do not violate country’s law (as well as law on human rights).
Else, if thugs would be allowed to come in power, than they could even change constitution and make law that all Chaudharies in Pakistan would be personal servants and cooks of parliamentarians, and then you could become their personal servant and cook. But obviously, since there is law in the country, if they would do that, you will go to court and regardless of what constitution says (whatever changes they made in constitution), court would make sure your basic rights is respected (that means, court would save you from becoming personal servant and cook of politicians).
If parliamentarians do not accept court verdict (that they should accept constitutionally) than they should know that they only rule because of moral ground, else they have no power in the country (as executive power works when others obey). In such situation, army is the most strongest power in the country and army would be justified to get into power and hang all those who did not obeyed court orders.
I have feelings that if by any chance, army comes this time, it would not be for 10 or 12 years (or life time of one General), but it would be for indefinite period, and one army general would replace other as Chief executive of the country. Then, there would be no Saudi Arabia, UK or UAE for anyone (rather, many would not be there alive) … as army would pick all politicians and government servants who have reputation of corruption, then army would start investigating their assets, and if their assets is found beyond their means, then they would be shot dead on spot without delay or trial (obviously, trial is not needed, as these thugs do not believe on courts). So, very dangerous time for corrupts is waiting round the corner.