There never were any WMD

Blair ‘knew Iraq threat limited’

**The prime minister knew Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction ready for use within 45 minutes, former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook has claimed.
Before the war started Mr Blair privately admitted that Saddam Hussein had no weapons posing a “real and present danger”, Mr Cook said.

He added that Mr Blair had appeared prepared to go to war regardless of any progress made by UN weapons inspectors.
**
Downing Street said the claims, made in Mr Cook’s new book, were “absurd”.

Cabinet ‘mutiny’
**
Mr Cook said it became clear that the prime minister did not consider Iraq’s weapons an imminent threat when they spoke two weeks before war started.

His book is based on diaries kept during the tense period in the run-up to the conflict.
**
Robin Cook resigned in protest at the prospect of war

In extracts published by the Sunday Times Mr Cook also says the head of the Joint Intelligence Committee, John Scarlett, “assented” when he suggested Iraq had no WMD which could target large cities.

And he claims that a “large number of ministers” spoke up in cabinet against British involvement in the US-led military action.

It was the nearest thing to a “mutiny” he had seen since Mr Blair took office, said Mr Cook, who quit his cabinet post in March in protest at the prospect of military intervention.

‘Well known’

The claims were dismissed by Downing Street.

A spokesman said: "The idea that the prime minister ever said that Saddam Hussein didn’t have weapons of mass destruction is absurd.

"His views have been consistent throughout, both publicly and privately, as his Cabinet colleagues know.

“Robin Cook’s views are well known and have been expressed many times before.”

:slight_smile:

**Kay Says Iraq Weapons May Still Be Found **
1 hour, 43 minutes ago

By DAVID HO, Associated Press Writer
**
WASHINGTON - Weapons hunters in Iraq (news - web sites) are pursuing tips that point to the possible presence of anthrax and Scud missiles still hidden in the country, the chief searcher said Sunday.

David Kay told Congress last week that his survey team had not found nuclear, biological or chemical weapons so far. But he argued against drawing conclusions, saying he expects to provide a full picture on Iraq’s weapons programs in six months to nine months.
**
While lacking physical evidence for the presence anthrax or Scuds, Kay said tips from Iraqis are motivating the search for them.

Critics, including many in Congress, say Kay’s findings do not support most of the Bush administration’s prewar assertions that the United States faced an imminent, serious threat from Iraq’s Saddam Hussein (news - web sites) because of widespread and advanced Iraqi weapons programs.

President Bush (news - web sites) has said the U.S.-led war on Iraq was justified despite the failure to find weapons.

Kay reported that searchers found a vial of live botulinum bacteria that had been stored since 1993 in an Iraqi scientist’s refrigerator. The bacteria make botulinum toxin, which can be used as a biological weapon, but Kay has offered no evidence that the bacteria had been used in a weapons program.

The live bacteria was among a collection of “reference strains” of biological organisms that could not be used to produce biological warfare agents.

Kay said Sunday the same scientist told investigators that he was asked to hide another much larger cache of strains, but “after a couple of days he turned them back because he said they were too dangerous. He has small children in the house.”

Kay said the cache “contains anthrax and that’s one reason we’re actively interested in getting it.” Kay, speaking on “Fox News Sunday,” did not say whether the anthrax was live or a strain used only for anthrax research.

Before the war, Iraqis said they had destroyed their supply of anthrax. Inspectors haven’t found any and Iraqis haven’t been able to provide evidence to satisfy investigators that they did destroy it. Experts note that old supplies of anthrax would have degraded by now.

While the Bush administration argued before taking the country to war that Iraq’s arsenal posed an imminent threat, much of what Kay discovered is that Iraq had interest in such weapons and was researching some agents.

Sen. Joe Lieberman (news - web sites), D-Conn., said Kay’s report shows Saddam’s clear intent to develop chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them. He said, however, that the administration didn’t tell the public the whole truth.

“There is some evidence that the Bush administration exaggerated unnecessarily,” he told “Fox News Sunday.” Lieberman, a presidential candidate, said the exaggeration “did discredit what was otherwise a very just cause of fighting tyranny and terrorism.”

Bush and Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) have contended the vial of botulinum bacteria that Kay’s team found is one strong piece of evidence of Saddam’s weapons intent.

Searches have been unsuccessful for the kind of long-range Scud missiles the Iraqis fired at Saudi Arabia and Israel in 1991. Many were destroyed during and after the Persian Gulf War (news - web sites), but the Bush administration had accused Iraq of continuing to hide Scuds.

Kay said there are indications there may still be Scuds even though Iraq declared it got rid of them in the early 1990s.

“We have Iraqis now telling us that they continued until 2001, early 2002, to be capable of mixing and preparing Scud missile fuel. Scud missile fuel is only useful in Scud missiles,” he said. “Why would you continue to produce Scud missile fuel if you didn’t have Scuds? We’re looking for the Scuds.”

Kay’s report to Congress said the information on fuel production came from Iraqi sources and has not been confirmed with documents or physical evidence.

Weapons hunters still are looking for chemical weapons at scores of large ammunition storage sites throughout Iraq. Because of the size of the depots, searchers have examined only 10 of 130 sites so far, Kay said.

“These are sites that contain — the best estimate is between 600,000 and 650,000 tons of arms,” he said. “That’s about one-third of the entire ammunition stockpile of the much larger U.S. military.”

The Iraqis stored chemical weapons, often unmarked, among conventional munitions, so “you really have to examine each one,” Kay said. He said 26 sites are on a critical list to be examined quickly.

well kay is more interested in that $600 million than anything else and who is he kidding by saying they will find WMD in 6-9 months. how much time was given to UN team to find and destroy iraq’s WMD? all this is BS. they will either plant a few missiles here and there only to discover them accidently later or will try to lengthen the search process only to cool down the whole issue.

Want yet more proof that this Bush regime lied KNOWINGLY to the Americans and to the world? Read this. (And watch this: Pelley’s report will be broadcast on 60 Minutes II, Wednesday, Oct. 15 at 8 p.m. ET/PT.)

"Ex-Aide: Powell Misled Americans

(CBS) The person responsible for analyzing the Iraqi weapons threat for Colin Powell says the Secretary of State misinformed Americans during his speech at the U.N. last winter.

Greg Thielmann tells Correspondent Scott Pelley that at the time of Powell’s speech, Iraq didn’t pose an imminent threat to anyone – not even its own neighbors. “…I think my conclusion [about Powell’s speech] now is that it’s probably one of the low points in his long distinguished service to the nation,” says Thielmann.

Pelley’s report will be broadcast on 60 Minutes II, Wednesday, Oct. 15 at 8 p.m. ET/PT.

Thielmann also tells Pelley that he believes the decision to go to war was made first and then the intelligence was interpreted to fit that conclusion. “…The main problem was that the senior administration officials have what I call faith-based intelligence,” says Thielmann.
“They knew what they wanted the intelligence to show. They were really blind and deaf to any kind of countervailing information the intelligence community would produce. I would assign some blame to the intelligence community and most of the blame to the senior administration officials.”

Steve Allinson and a dozen other U.N. inspectors in Iraq also watched Powell’s speech. “Various people would laugh at various times [during Powell’s speech] because the information he was presenting was just, you know, didn’t mean anything – had no meaning,” says Allinson.

Pelley asks, “When the Secretary finished the speech, you and the other inspectors turned to each other and said what?” Allinson responds, “’They have nothing.’”

Allinson gives Pelley several examples of why he believes Iraq didn’t have weapons of mass destruction. One time, he was sent to find decontamination vehicles that turned out to be fire trucks. Another time, a satellite spotted what they thought were trucks used for biological weapons.

“We were told we were going to the site to look for refrigerated trucks specifically linked to biological agents,” Allinson tells Pelley. “…We found seven or eight [trucks], I think, in total, and they had cobwebs in them. Some samples were taken and nothing was found.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/10/14/60II/main577975.shtml