The U.S. needn't to lose a solider if it did not want to but the U.S. isn't in Iraq to kill Iraqi's, it's there to rebuild it, you should hope for their success or Iraq will be a giant ****hole worse than it was or is now. If the U.S. fails as you seem to want do you really think the UN is going to fill the void?
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by underthedome: *
you should hope for their success or Iraq will be a giant ***hole worse than it was or is now.
[/QUOTE]
Temper, temper. I know it is upsetting for you to come to terms with the fact the US military has killed tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians and soldiers, akin to the levels of the butcher Saddam you supported so long.
UTD, don't waste your time. Everyone knows if the US were in the same business as Saddam there would have been millions of dead Iraqis by now. The truth is American soldiers have gone over and beyond in their attempts to spare civilian casualties. I know it, you know it, and any unbiased, intelligent person capable of thinking for himself knows it.
Guys what Saddam are you talking bout? Where is he? He is hiding or overthrown whatever the case might be. What about rebuilding process? All the destruction by the occupational forces from the air bombardment? Whom do you think that killed? The Donkeys? Or was it the Camels?
Saddam may be gone or whatever, but does that mean people are happy with that the occupiers are doing? Why do you think there are US soldiers being killed almost everyday?
Maliky I've never lost my temper with you, unless your one off those Asses's on the road in front of me who don't know how to drive. :)
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
Maliky I've never lost my temper with you, unless your one off those Asses's on the road in front of me who don't know how to drive. :)
[/QUOTE]
As we have seen in Iraq even some Asses's can do a lot damage, and leave the American soldiers with big red faces. So don't do down those brave Asses's. :)
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chuck de Phatté: *
Why do you think there are US soldiers being killed almost everyday?
[/QUOTE]
I guess the Iraqi's were just dumb all these years, having all these weapons and not using them against Saddam, crazy masochists.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
I guess the Iraqi's were just dumb all these years, having all these weapons and not using them against Saddam, crazy masochists.
[/QUOTE]
They did in 1991 after your President at the time goaded them to rise and "set aside Saddam the dictator". But then the US was just content on taking pictures from the planes, as Saddam butchered tens of thousands of Iraqi's. Don't think the Iraqi (Shias) have ever forgotten that period, and distrust the American's for it, as do the Iraqi Kurds who were abandoned by the American's in the mid 1970's after they rose up against Saddam. Let's also not forget how the Reagan administration tried to cover up or downplay Halabja gassing of the Kurds in the late 1980's.
The UN didn't want Saddam to be overthrown in 1991, are you saying that the U.S. ignored the UN 10 years to late and should have taken him out back then?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by underthedome: *
I guess the Iraqi's were just dumb all these years, having all these weapons and not using them against Saddam, crazy masochists.
[/QUOTE]
And the Americans have been even dumber to supply them with those weapons all these years. It came back to haunt them.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chuck de Phatté: *
And the Americans have been even dumber to supply them with those weapons all these years. It came back to haunt them.
[/QUOTE]
Very true. Removing Saddam and the terrorist elements that don’t give a squat about the Iraqi people can help rectify the mistakes made in the past as well as helping the Iraqi people rebuild Iraq.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chuck de Phatté: *
And the Americans have been even dumber to supply them with those weapons all these years. It came back to haunt them.
[/QUOTE]
Chuck, the fact is that is that American soldiers and American weapons are killing Iraqi women and children in their hundreds and thousands now. They can't blame Saddam anymore. Since the fall of Saddam the American's far outstrip any one, and any so-called terrorists they go after in the rest of the world in killing innocent civilians. Whos is the bigger terrorist?
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Malik73: *
Whos is the bigger terrorist?
[/QUOTE]
One of the definitions of terrorism in Websters dictionary is "mode of government by intimidation", which is what the Americans are doing in Iraq as depicted in the pictures here.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Chuck de Phatté: *
One of the definitions of terrorism in Websters dictionary is "mode of government by intimidation", which is what the Americans are doing in Iraq as depicted in the pictures here.
[/QUOTE]
Absolutely true.