Libya (with the WMD negotiations over, they are “safe” for now)
Iran (who opened up to the IAEA and fingered Pakistan, the *******s - now they are “safe”)
Syria: A list of Demands
End support for “terrorists”
Pull troops out of Lebanon
End acquisition and production of weapons of mass destruction and long-range ballistic missiles
Prevent terrorists and weapons from entering Iraq
Pakistan? We are so dead.
Anyway do you feel that the US is after a hit list of Islamic countries that pose a threat to their regional hegemony and greater designs for influence in key strategic areas within the world? Or you just think that these countries are rogue states and need to be dealt with. Americans the second option is only given because i am a fair man. But everybody knwos the second option is pure bs.
They say “jis ki lathi uski bhains” simple as that.
I mean U.S. demands Korea, Iran, Libya etc. to abandon their nuclear programs because U.S. assumes they will use it for wrong purposes. How can we be sure U.S. won’t use its weapons the wrong way? What if Osama stole nuclear war heads or whatever from U.S. ? Ok i sound silly I know but who can rule out the possibility? If they can hijack 4 aeroplanes at a time why can’t they steal that? Afterwards U.S. will say Pakistan gave nuclear technology to Osama
Am i making any sense? I think 1st sentence in this reply describes it all don’t bother reading the rest of it
ie. pacify all opposition to Israel (Iraq, Iran, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan) and maintain the status quo for Israel which is why they are comfortably carving up the west bank and annexing more land into greater Israel under their "security fence"
