[quote]
Originally posted by SalmanKhana:
*go Taleban ' if they are destroying shia'z mosque.. they are doing fine in my opinion. *
[/quote]
Reminds me of BABRI MASJID in India. Lots of simillarities.
[quote]
Originally posted by SalmanKhana:
*go Taleban ' if they are destroying shia'z mosque.. they are doing fine in my opinion. *
[/quote]
Reminds me of BABRI MASJID in India. Lots of simillarities.
unity seems to be far off in this world.. even in the posted discussions, there is an air of incompatibility, and reason is lost in the wind...
salam,
thas cool and interesting.
THe biggest thing wrong with this thread is that we are discussing what the taliban will do. Everyone is speculating while the people in Afghanistan are dying and moving to refugee camps in Pakistan.
Forget all this BS. If they do demolish, then I will condem them. I am not going to support the argument because there are more important issues at hand. for example the UN refuses to move the aid to inside Afghanistan and they are staying in Pakistan. THereby pakistan becomes a magnet to these people. THey are poor, and have nothing.
As a nation, we have to help them, even if it means being silent on some issues we might disagree so that the sanctions are removed and the Afganis can proseper once again.
That is all I have to say.
Peace!
GFQ Thanks for deleting the posts. You can see that I never starts mudslinging but some people force to.
Any way, were you get satisfied with my view point in my last post addressed to you or not?
from salaman khan "go Taleban .. if they are destroying shia'z mosque.. they are doing fine in my opinion.
[This message has been edited by Girl from Quraysh (edited May 07, 2001).]
"
wow now everybody knows what you r ??? what is your mission??? so you are interested in destroy the shia mosque ..... you are in fools paradise ,,.... Histroy shows lots of people tried to do this but they cant ... you read YAZEED tried .... you have seen his end.............
So you are an ANTI SHIA e ALI? Lot of people were and are but nothing and noone can destroy them. People who try to destroy them has been destroyed like YAZID..
Analyze it, you ask me if i'm satisfied with your point of view, that question makes me smile, i don't know if i have the right to say whether what you believe is satisfactory to me or not. But if you are asking me if i agree with you, then let me respond to your statements...
What happened in Herat can very well potentially lead(may not be systematic destruction sponsored by Afghan government) to what is stated in original post i.e. destruction of major shrines and mosques that belong to shias.
I'm glad you acknowledge that, and that was my main argument. In my opinion the original post despite being based on factual information, seemed to the have the intent of misinforming rather than informing.
Original article may be a brainchild of Iraninan agency.
Which everyone knows is not sympathetic to the Taliban cause.
** If I was in the same situation, I would follow more diplomatic way to safeguard my people. First of all I would not let my people die of hunger just because of a controversial man who might well be terrorist. I would ask myself,why this person (who has lot of money to spend on masterminding terrorist activities throught the world though controversial) can not feed my people. What benefit do I get by hosting this man?**
What i don't like about your approach, is that it seems that you are placing the blame squarely on the Taliban. The sanctions are have been put in place by the international community, who know full well the situation within Afghanistan, 22 years of war that has destroyed the infrastructure of the country, the worst drought in fifty years, fields full of landmines...i could go on. These sanctions, as you say were placed because of Afghanistan's refusal to give up 'an alleged terrorist', note the word allege, and give it more than a passing glance. The taliban have prevailed time and time again, upon the UN, and the USA to provide proof to support their accusations with no result, and they have also stated their willingness to send Osama Bin Laden outside Afghanistan to face trial under Islamic law, which the US promptly refused.
Second if I could get money to save Buddha statue, I would rather accept the money and use it to feed my people instead. Call it hypocricy or whatever, I would care for my dying people first even it takes me to lie.
I'm afraid it isn't so easy, and it displays alot of naivety on your part if you believe it to be so. Moreover as i've stated previously, the UNESCO committee flatly refused to have the money spent in more necessary venues, such as providing food and shelter.
[This message has been edited by Girl from Quraysh (edited May 10, 2001).]
Everybody is so confused about Taliban....
They are not destroying Shia Mosques...what they have destroyed can be read in my previous post...
And BTW i am trying to get permission....if I could..I will provide you direct contact with any of of Taliban's Minister in Kabul...then you can check with them..whats right and whats wrong