Supreme Court Should Exercise Judicial Restraint on Presidential Immunity

[hanibal]

Re: Supreme Court Should Exercise Judicial Restraint on Presidential Immunity

@Shamraz_Khan

^^ I don’t get it. What exactly is your point?** Judges & voters have separate roles.** In a democracy voters give mandate to elected govt & if its fails to performs its voters who (at least theoretically) throw them out. As for the Constitution, it a basic structure of governance & good/bad performance is not listed in the constitution.

This is news to me, all i hear from PPP leadership and its followers that People read voters are the judge and Judges are judge of nothing…

Now in democracy, voters elected the govt, but isn’t the in the same democracy, judges take actions (read hear cases and passes judgements)… now if you are saying that Judges should have let the Reco-dec go along, they should have not heard the pleas against Rental Power Scam, they should have not taken action Haj Scandals and should have allowed it then i am sorry my friend, i am not illiterate Jiyala, who will buy this logic… i must say, you need to sell this to the PPP site ( if there is any) or to the Jahil Jiyalas of PPP through out the world, they will buy it!!!