Supreme Court Should Exercise Judicial Restraint on Presidential Immunity

[Amal]

Re: Supreme Court Should Exercise Judicial Restraint on Presidential Immunity

@chacha_Ghalib

By convincing the opposition to lodge complaints in the courts, for example?

If tomorrow government abolishes the supreme court, you want the opposition to stay indoors?

@chacha_Ghalib

I am NOT a supporter of PPP but that is quite beside the point. If they haven’t performed then let the electorate throw them out. Why don’t we trust the electorate to hold them accountable?

While I am fully in favour of sending a government home by not re-electing it for another term, I also find that this is the most lenient way for punishing politicians who bring your country to its knees in five years. Electoral mandate is not a 5-year licence to loot the country at your will and go telling people not to elect you again. If I accumulate 5 biilion in 5 years, what problem I possibly may have by not getting re-elected?

Tell me one more thing, suppose there are 10 parties in a country and all join hands under the umbrella of democracy. They make a coalition, win poll and assume the reins of the country. Since they have absolute majority, they can make laws to cripple the judiciary and make their tenure indefinite. What do I do now?