Supersub and Risk Minimization

[fair_balance]

Re: Supersub and Risk Minimization

@umair_ahmed

My point is that the losing captain should not blame his mishandling of supersub if he loses the toss. I think supersub benefits both the winner of the toss and the loser. Inzimam did not bring the super sub into the game when necessary.

So you dont agree that supersub rule is unfair??

Regarding this situation..I think he should have used it to bowl left over 4-5 overs.Keep in mind supersub can only bowl 10 overs minus number of over already bowled by the guy who he is substituting.

But in my thread here I am questioning ,if having Arshad is a good Idea or other batsman ( may be Yasir) could have been better choice for supersub.