Stu would you then say that anyone who criticizes US policy is doing it to defend "Islam"
hmmmm
[QUOTE]
Originally posted by Stu: *
**I believe that you do feel compelled to defend Islam, and that part of your motivation stems from being ashamed at the status of the religion you hold so dear. Psychology 101.
[/QUOTE]
*
Similarly, i can ASSUME that your defense of the Bush admin is because, at heart, you are really a cowboy neo-con Christian fundamentalist who is extremely happy with the right wing, fundamentalist stance adopted by the man who wines and dines noted Islamophobes and xenophobes at the White House. Psychology 101.
no that would be psychology 102, Stu already got the psychology 101 deal going.
what lame ass university is this anyways?
i dunno. Some racist university by the sounds of it.
Under the circumstances it's the duty of Muslims to defend Islam as it has been twisted and perverted by Islamic fundamentalists (ie: Bin Laden) as well as Christian Fundamentalists (ie: Pat Robertson). Who in the same situation wouldn’t?
I fail to see why race keeps coming up? Is Islam a race?
CSU - Common Sense University
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Fraudz: *
no that would be psychology 102, Stu already got the psychology 101 deal going.
[/QUOTE]
Was this before or after Stu_pid took Bigot 101?
[QUOTE]
cowboy neo-con Christian fundamentalist who is extremely happy with the right wing, fundamentalist stance adopted by the man who wines and dines noted Islamophobes and xenophobes at the White House
[/QUOTE]
Your stereotypical view of americans is well known.
Regarding some of Bush’s comments in his speech…
US chief Iraq arms expert quits, BBC
The head of the team searching for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, David Kay, has resigned.
Mr Kay said he did not believe Iraq possessed large stockpiles of chemical or biological weapons.
No surprise here, the propagated lies of George W Bush in his State of Union addresses. This is all about neo-con forces in action which are utilizing lie after lie in order to influence US foreign policy.
White House Admits Bush Lied in 2002 State of The Union](http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/13/1549215) Democracy Now, 13 Feb 04
**President Bush claimed in his 2002 State of the Union address that the U.S. discovered in Afghanistan detailed plans of U.S. nuclear plants. The Bush administration was forced to admit this week that the claim was not based on factual evidence after the Nuclear Regulatory Commission said there was no evidence any such plans were found in Afghanistan. **
Bush claimed that the U.S. has discovered in Afghanistan detailed plans of U.S. nuclear plants. On Monday night **the White House told the Wall Street Journal that Bush’s statement admitted no such plans had ever been found. **This story has resurfaced this month after a commissioner on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission responded to an inquiry of Greenpeace and that the NRC was aware of no evidence that diagrams of nuclear plants had been found in Afghanistan.