Re: Standard of Education in Pakistan
Mirch: Captain1 is right. I was also thinking what you mean by quoting figures 50 Vs 7 in favour of defence converting to 50 Vs 7 in favour of education. :).
There is no doubt that Pakistan needs to spend more on education. At present, Pakistan spends ~2 to 2.5 percent of GDP on education … though target set in 2000 by Musharraf government was to spend ~7 percent of GDP on education. It does not mean, this low expenditure on education is because Pakistan spends a lot on defence, as defence budget is ~2.5 to 3 percent of GDP (5.5 to 6 billion US dollars).
So to increase expenditure on education, Pakistan should not spend less on defence nor Pakistan need to spend less on defence. Fact is that, Pakistan can allocate and spend more on education without reducing expenditure on defence. This can be done by:
1: Eliminating or at least decreasing corruption (it cost ~ US $ 25 billion a year)
2: Increasing revenue (I think, if Pakistan stops corruption and increase efficiency, revenue could triple easily)
3: Stop wasting money on doling state owned enterprises (it cost ~ £3.5 billion a year)
4: Stop wasting money on luxuries of elected representatives
5: Give good and efficient governance free from corruption and nepotism, so that Pakistan starts growing at above 7 percent a year. That would increase revenue as well as would make country richer.
Etc.
Further, government can make education more efficient by spending money at right places and stopping corruption as well as wastes in education sector.
Abolishing all quota system from country and curbing on nepotism in jobs as well as admission would further increase efficiency as well as productivity in education sector (and country at large).
Note: quota system, corruption, and nepotism effects standard of education as well as governance directly and indirectly. Directly because inefficient and incapable people get into job who do not rely on their work but rely on relationships, contacts and do corruption without care or fear. Indirectly, because it creates frustration amongst unemployed (thus increasing crime) and takes away incentives to work hard from people at work as well as students who are prospective employees.
Anyhow, fact is that, if one takes into account government as well as private expenditure on education, Pakistan spends as much on education (~2 to 2.5 percent) as defence (~2.5 to 3 percent).
Pakistan operating expenditure on education in current dollars (wages, Salaries, etc). The figure excludes capital investments on education (buildings and equipments). Thus, if one takes into account capital investments, total expenditure on education would be much higher than mentioned below. The figures as well as graph given on the site mentioned shows how education budget started increasing exponentially from 2003-04 onward until year 2007-08 (increased ~2.5 times in 4 years).
Pakistan - education expenditure
Year: … Value (current US dollars)
Yahya period:
1969-70: US $ 102 million
1970-71: US $ 138 million
Bhutto Period:
1971-72: US $ 120 million
Educational institutions were nationalised in 1972 resulting in reduced educational expenditure as well as deteriorating educational standard in Pakistan.
1972-73: US $ 83 million
1973-74: US $ 116 million
1974-75: US $ 178 million
1975-76: US $ 210 million
1976-77: US $ 245 million
Doubled in 6 years from $120 million to $245 million
Zia period:
1977-78: US $ 298 million
1978-79: US $ 331 million
Denationalisation of education in 1979 saw significant growth in education expenditure from private sectors.
1979-80: US $ 396 million
1980-81: US $ 458 million
1981-82: US $ 493 million
1982-83: US $ 556 million
1983-84: US $ 682 million
1984-85: US $ 714 million
1985-86: US $ 761 million
1986-87: US $ 750 million
1987-88: US $ 766 million
Increased 3.1 times in 11 years, from $245 million to $766 million
Period of thugs (BB and NS):
1988-89: US $ 833 million
1989-90: US $ 900 million
1990-91: US $ 1,030 million
1991-92: US $ 1,020 million
1992-93: US $ 1,184 million
1993-94: US $ 1,246 million
1994-95: US $ 1,467 million
1995-96: US $ 1,498 million
1996-97: US $ 1,429 million
1997-98: US $ 1,433 million
1998-99: US $ 1,463 million
Increased 1.9 times in 11 years, from $766 million to $1,463 million
Musharraf period:
1999-00: US $ 1,712 million
2000-01: US $ 1,673 million
2001-02: US $ 1,704 million
2002-03: US $ 2,012 million
Education (and health care) got transferred to local government from Provincial government.
2003-04: US $ 1,520 million
2004-05: US $ 1,914 million
2005-06: US $ 2,525 million
2006-07: US $ 2,999 million
2007-08: US $ 3,603 million
(Increased 2.5 times in 9 years, from $1,463 million to $3,603 million)
Zardari period:
2008-09: US $ 3,178 million
(Decreased ~15 percent in first year from $3,603 million to $3,178 million, and still decreasing)
Note: Increase of 2.5 times in 9 years during Musharraf period is misleading as increase was substantially higher because a lot was spent on infrastructures, buildings and equipments during Musharraf period, more than during any past periods. Corruption was also very low during Musharraf period, and that means most spent was utilised productively.
Further, educational responsibility and budget was transferred to local governments from provincial governments in year 2002-03. That means more on the spot supervision by local government of what was happening to money spent. On the other hand, since representatives in local government were available to people within their locality, people could have monitored their performance and budget spent by questioning and scrutinising them easily, making demands from them what people wanted.
[Anyhow, all such demands, questioning and scrutinising stopped once local government system got packed up]