Re: Should Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC) Have A Permanent Seat On UNSC?
^ You probably didn't read the reply. My argument has nothing against India. If you say Australia should be included as a permanent member, I'd say the same thing. I believe having veto power in UNSC has made it an impotent organization. I am perfectly fine with India or Japan or Australia or whoever, getting a permanent seat. I am against the veto power.
Plus I completely disagreed with your assertion that some how UNSC is not effective because India is NOT in it. Please elaborate. You completely lost me with your thought process. How having an additional veto yielding member in UNSC make it MORE effective??