Re: Shajra-e-mal`oona
Salamun alaikum
First of all kindly clear your concepts which are based on very poor information
- Umayya was not from the same tribe from which Muhammad SAWAW was. Umayya was a slave to which Abde Shams S/o Abde Munaaf had adopted from Rome. In Arabs before Islam adopted sons considered as real sons and they also inherits to which Islam prohibits afterwards.
- When it is said that Aal-e-Ibrahim then it doesn’t include his fathers and fore fathers. And if someone refers Aale Imran than it includes Muses, Maryam, And Eisa Alehimus salam but not Yaqoob, Yousuf and Dawood alehimus salam. Likewise if it is said that Aale Muhammad sawaw then it definitely not includes his father and fore fathers. Similarly when it is said that bani umayya then it means the descendant of Umayya but not his fathers and forefathes.
- It is a very serious ignorance to say that devil was the teachers of Angels. It is absolutely wrong conception and totally against the Quranic verses. In sura baqara it is mentioned there that Angels when asked to tell the names of persons presented before them that [RIGHT]قَالُواْ سُبْحَانَكَ لاَ عِلْمَ لَنَا إِلاَّ مَا عَلَّمْتَنَا إِنَّكَ أَنتَ الْعَلِيمُ الْحَكِيمُ {32}[/RIGHT] Shakir 2:32 They said: Glory be to Thee! we have no knowledge but that which Thou hast taught us; surely Thou art the Knowing, the Wise. Pickthal 2:32 They said: Be glorified! We have no knowledge saving that which Thou hast taught us. Lo! Thou, only Thou, art the Knower, the Wise.
So the teacher of Angels is only Allah SWT and nobody else therefore by saying that devil was the teacher of Angels you not only disgrace the angels but (maz Allah) you place the devil on Allah’s place (Astaghfirullah).
- Another very big misunderstanding is about the Noh and his son. It was proved from Quran that that guy was not the son of Hazrat Noh alehis salam but he considered him his own son. Allah SWT disclosed this fact in Sura Hud as [RIGHT]وَنَادَى نُوحٌ رَّبَّهُ فَقَالَ رَبِّ إِنَّ ابُنِي مِنْ أَهْلِي وَإِنَّ وَعْدَكَ الْحَقُّ وَأَنتَ أَحْكَمُ الْحَاكِمِينَ {45}[/RIGHT] Shakir 11:45 And Nuh cried out to his Lord and said: My Lord! surely my son is of my family, and Thy promise is surely true, and Thou art the most just of the judges. Pickthal 11:45 And Noah cried unto his Lord and said: My Lord! Lo! my son is of my household! Surely Thy promise is the truth and Thou are the Most Just of Judges. [RIGHT]قَالَ يَا نُوحُ إِنَّهُ لَيْسَ مِنْ أَهْلِكَ إِنَّهُ عَمَلٌ غَيْرُ صَالِحٍ فَلاَ تَسْأَلْنِ مَا لَيْسَ لَكَ بِهِ عِلْمٌ إِنِّي أَعِظُكَ أَن تَكُونَ مِنَ الْجَاهِلِينَ {46}[/RIGHT] Shakir 11:46 He said: O Nuh! surely he is not of your family; surely he is (the doer of) other than good deeds, therefore ask not of Me that of which you have no knowledge; surely I admonish you lest you may be of the ignorant Pickthal 11:46 He said: O Noah! Lo! he is not of thy household; lo! he is of evil conduct, so ask not of Me that whereof thou hast no knowledge. I admonish thee lest thou be among the ignorant.
Translators here could not understand that Allah SWT is not telling here that he (son) was the doer of evil conduct but Allah SWT is disclosing to Noh A.S that he (son) himself is a product of evil conduct of his wife. And this fact is further elaborated in Sura Tehreem
ضَرَبَ اللَّهُ مَثَلًا لِّلَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا اِمْرَأَةَ نُوحٍ وَاِمْرَأَةَ لُوطٍ كَانَتَا تَحْتَ عَبْدَيْنِ مِنْ عِبَادِنَا صَالِحَيْنِ فَخَانَتَاهُمَا فَلَمْ يُغْنِيَا عَنْهُمَا مِنَ اللَّهِ شَيْئًا وَقِيلَ ادْخُلَا النَّارَ مَعَ الدَّاخِلِينَ {10}
Shakir 66:10 Allah sets forth an example to those who disbelieve the wife of Nuh and the wife of Lut: they were both under two of Our righteous servants, but they acted treacherously towards them so they availed them naught against Allah, and it was said: Enter both the fire with those who enter.
Yusufali 66:10 Allah sets forth, for an example to the Unbelievers, the wife of Noah and the wife of Lut: they were (respectively) under two of our righteous servants, but they were false to their (husbands), and they profited nothing before Allah on their account, but were told: "Enter ye the Fire along with (others) that enter!"
That is why Hazrat Noh A.S seeks refuge and forgiveness from Allah SWT as
[RIGHT]قَالَ رَبِّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ أَنْ أَسْأَلَكَ مَا لَيْسَ لِي بِهِ عِلْمٌ وَإِلاَّ تَغْفِرْ لِي وَتَرْحَمْنِي أَكُن مِّنَ الْخَاسِرِينَ {47}[/RIGHT]
Shakir 11:47 He said: My Lord! I seek refuge in Thee from asking Thee that of which I have no knowledge; and if Thou shouldst not forgive me and have mercy on me, I should be of the losers.
Pickthal 11:47 He said: My Lord! Lo! in Thee do I seek refuge (from the sin) that I should ask of Thee that whereof I have no knowledge. Unless Thou forgive me and have mercy on me I shall be among the lost.
Similarly was the case of Loot A.S’s Wife. She had also committed ‘khayanat’ of his husband.
So the key of ayat of Sura Al-Asra which was quoted earlier is in the words “wa ma yazeed-o-hum”. As much you examine the ayat you may bound to understand that it was nothing but a forecast of “bani umayya’s tughyane kabeer”.