Seriously Germany its not like you don't have an history with the jews

Re: Seriously Germany its not like you don't have an history with the jews

I don't understand this! What about the benefits of circumcision for boys as has been proven before? Circumcision for females should be illegal though.

Re: Seriously Germany its not like you don't have an history with the jews

So baby boys should be mutilated but girls shouldn't?

Re: Seriously Germany its not like you don't have an history with the jews

^ Removal of foreskin does not constitute "mutilation." It doesn't maim the male and has marginal medical benefits. The WHO/UN considers it helpful in AIDs prevention.

FGM is barbarity - you're removing external genitalia. Women have serious, chronic health issues as a result and are in pain for the rest of their lives.

Forget the fact that they are done for different reasons, there is no comparison.

The procedure left the 4 year old bleeding heavily. "Grievous bodily harm" was the charge brought against the doctor.

Re: Seriously Germany its not like you don't have an history with the jews

Party pooper.

Re: Seriously Germany its not like you don’t have an history with the jews

^ Yes … it’s like that see-saw where everyone has climbed on one side then a big hairy dude sits on the other side and balances it out … :hehe:

Re: Seriously Germany its not like you don't have an history with the jews

ruddy foreskin sympathisers

Re: Seriously Germany its not like you don't have an history with the jews

It is more complicated than you might think. A few questions to consider...
1. Does the procedure cause a permanent injury?
2. Does the injury has a functional impact?
3.In the cultural settings of the subject, would he/she better off with the procedure or without it?

All these criteria must be considered before passing a judgement. Based on these criteria, for example, male circumcision is acceptable, while female circumcision is an abomination. I stand be the conclusion, BTW.