Maverick_27:
simply me … i cud not understand y u r so shy to discuss the real subject of the thread.
nwayz as u r harping on the same string … i wud try to explain it through a rather indirect example
blasphemy laws are great indeed … in my person opinion protection of relegious susceptibilty by state is most important personal right and shud not be offended.
following is the link to the jug suriya article in which he simply **doubted the existence of Ram from historical point of view (provided the fact that he is not first person who have raised this question) and it offended the follower of hindu relegion. **
there are around 550 comments on dat blog and u wud get the idea how ppl of ur own country were unhappy , frustrtated and disgrutle over it. interestingly the article does not say even a single negative remarks about RAM. still u will feel the heat …
go ahead and make legislation to protect and establish the true identity of RAM. who has stopped u.
Is Ram really for real?:Juggle-Bandhi:Jug Suraiya’s blog-The Times Of India
Just for a second imagine if some author had written the same about the prophet(pbuh). I seriously doubt if the author would have been alive now. We do not want blasphemy laws to protect historical figures…