Re: Secret Agencies set to kill Imran Khan
[quote]
I have read it: it says key words like parliament is supreme..the law is the same for everyone. Now I think everyone will agree that's not the case in Pakistan.
[/quote]
We both are saying the same thing, your initial post was sarcasm, noted. No need to delve on this further.
[quote]
Please define what an agency man is; is it someone who has received official support to make a political party or an existing party which has received money?
[/quote]
Lets not be naive, we all know how agencies have played politics in Pakistan and General Hameed Gul is the prime example who on record has admitted to his actions. There is no defination for an agency man, what we have is a trail of political machinary that leads to agency footsteps. Imran Khan is aclassic example who was nurtured by none other than Gen Hameed Gul and continues to seek direction and support from the general. Why is it that Imran feels so outraged by the killings in Karachi yet has never raised an eye brow against the 700+soldiers killed on the western borders? Cause the agencies who continue to defend their messed up policies of supporting the taliban or Pushtoon solution for Afghanistan do not want any criticism of their products. Imran was used to derail the democratic process against BB and NS, quickly found solace with Musharraf then fell out of his grace because Gen Hameed Gul and his Afghan cell were seen as the main problem.
To this day, Musharraf or any other political or army general cannot afford to offend the Afghan cell agency operatives and for good reason, these ppl have built huge financial resources thru Afghan jihad, opium and guns trafficking and continue to be funded by their ideologues from the land of pure soodi arabai.
Now u may wish to reject this as nothing but conjecture, wheres the proof? well its in the messed up country where hundrfed of soldiers are killed and not a whimper is expressed by its political lobbies, hundreds and hundreds of innocent ppl are killed by sectarian fanatics and not a whisper from those who matter?
State of Pakistan is caught in its own trap of strategic depth that created and funded religious fanatics, their third defence lines that have now turned their weapons against them.
[QUOTE]
Your comments about Zehra and Mairaj are out of context; nobody will ever accuse Mairaj of being an agency person, and he served PTI for almost 5 years. In his resignation speech neither he nor Zehra accused Imran of being an agency person. While some of their criticism of Imran is quite valid, I can't take other former PTI people like Kashmala Tariq and Owais Ghani seriously, after all there support for Musharraf and criticism of Imrans dictatorship style is a bit funny.
[/QUOTE]
My comments are as pertinent as your reference of knowing ppl, so lets keep the dialogue on an equal footing.
Mairaj Khan sahib is an idealist and human, once he realized his mistake he withdrew support from Imran Khan. His comments regarding Imran Khan being a man in hurry come from a man who has spent his entire life in politics, suffered imprsonment's, beatings, abductions, harrassments and all the filth that could be thrown by the state. What has Imran Khan suffered? He continues to enjoy his privelaged life and has yet to make any claims of creating a party network of political activists who believe in a ideology, by the way what is Imran Khan's ideology? Find fault in others and offer nothing but his majesty as the only solution?
[QUOTE]
The Edhi story is a little more confusing, but Edhis political credentials are something which people forget, like Imran Khan he contested elections in the 1970's and lost, he also served in zias majlis e shura and was a close friend of his.
[/QUOTE]
Threatening anyone has nothing to do with political credentials, its like the neocons throwing allegations against their victims while defending their failed policies. Imran Khan supported Musharraf, so what does that mean, nothing. What cannot be denied is that Abdul Sattar EDHI has accused Imran Khan and Gen Hameed gul of threatening him for not joining their party.