Sangakkara new no. 1 Test Batsman

Sangakkara regains top test batsman ranking
http://www.cricinfo.com/rankings/content/current/page/211270.html

re: Sangakkara new no. 1 Test Batsman

What happened to world T20 rankings ?

I knew it much before that since ordinary batsmen like younus and yousuf hoged top spot..

BTW should not you change the heading to Gambhir ---->> Sangkara..

I mean that's how is the latest change of man on top spot..

Sour grapes, eh ??

Re: Sangakkara new no. 1 Test Batsman

Sangakkara deserves that spot,man of bog occasions and pressure.Also scores against quality bowlers/opposition.Can't say the same about Yousuf.No sour grapes or any thing .Just my observation.

*Have you even seen Gambhir bat? He's one unattractive batsman; as unflamboyant as it gets. If that spot had belonged to Rohit Sharma or Yuvraj, I wouldn't mind; atleast they are entertaining to watch. Gambhir is just one ugly duckling as far as batting is concerned. So to both of you twelve-year old idiots; take your smartass comments elsewhere.

Now Sangakkara, that's more like it. A classy batsman and so graceful when he is scoring his runs.*

Any batsman who can come down to pitch to fast bowlers as if spinners were bowlng and hoick them over the head in stands has to be quality batsman and Gambhri does this day in day out..

Never mind pakistanis in general have zlich knowledge when ti come to batting they think what latthmaars like afridi do is the real batting

*

LOL, coming down the pitch to a fast bowler is the sign of quality for you? And you think Pakistanis don't know "zlich" (it's zilch, you idiot) about batting! Amusing.

If you are going to act like a twelve-year old girl and keep denying that Gambhir is the most unentertaining batsman in the Indian line-up, so be it; I could care less. He is a mediocre, phateechar batsman and I wouldn't pay two pennies to watch his ugly batting (let's face it, we all watch cricket for entertainment, not for rankings). Rohit Sharma, on the other hand, is in a league way above phateechars like Gambhir, and hence you should shut up about the India-Pakistan prejudice as I'm above such nonsense (you clearly aren't , so grow up and stop whining). Adios.*

Accept nobel prize in literature for typo fixing :-))
Rohit will get his time under the sun.. Fact is Ganbhir is way betetr than any fo socalled batsman you have yes hit and giggle type of batsmanship that you guy are used is not considered batting in rest of the world..

Pls define unflamboyant, unattractive and ugly duckling as it relates to Gambhir's batting.

Is Gambhir as technically proficient as Sachin ? No !! Is he more effective than Rohit Sharma ? Yes !!

I am sure you find/found "tullebaaz" like Afridi & Inzamam "flamboyant"...so be it.

Dude, according to your own definition Afridi qualifies as a quality batsman :hehe:

Inzamam - a tulleybaaz... oh boy! - that's it... note to self... disregard Punjabee's cricket related comments in the future.

Nobody here calls Afridi a technically correct batsman - entertaining... yes...
he's not even a batsman in my book, he's a bowler, and batting is his secondary skill.

Brush up on your reading comprehension skills before you try talking about cricket with me again. You are on the "dumb idiots who don't know jack about cricket hence I should ignore them" list for now. Buh-bye.

LOL, machli khaa li hai bahut zyaada becharay ne. Har purana thread bump karke aise khush horaha hai jaise Kashmir fatha karliya hai, kahan kahan se aajatay hain phateechar log gupshup pe yaar, hadd hoti hai.