SA tour/ Inzi new captain, Rashid retained, Mushtaq recalled.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *

What bull.... the SA players are only cricket players... why should they risk their lives for something which is not of their making....its not for SA to promote or discourage terrorism in Pakistan... As outsiders they are correct in doing what they think is best for them....
The onus is on Pakistan is to improve its image to the external world about its law and order situation....

(BTW, having heard Minadad speak before, he is not half as articulate as he is made out to be in this piece...)
[/QUOTE]

A terrorist can strike anywhere and England is as much at risk as any other place because of its high profile particiaption in Afghanistan and Iraq. Why didnt SA players refuse to play there, because if we take your theory of terrorists blowing themselves up to kill goras as you put it than they could have done that in London as well.

During the current tour we had Mike Proctor (South African), Tiffin (Zimbabwean) both goras as match refree and umpire and also Sanjay Manjtrekar (Indian) as commentator. No one either threatened them or killed them. So all this safety concern is just a load of bull, and you know what all these three guys were in Karachi and Peshawar, two places where you are sure to be killed if one was to believe SA and its supporters. Knowing the amount of crime and killings in the main cities fo SA, one is more likely to be killed there than in Karachi or Peshawar. The bottom line is the players were tired after a long tour and took the easy way out.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *

And if the bomb did go off.... it will be a no-brainer to find out which country would be behind it...
[/QUOTE]

TYPICAL INDIAN THOUGHTS

P.S. No offence but thats the truth.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *

What bull.... the SA players are only cricket players... why should they risk their lives for something which is not of their making....its not for SA to promote or discourage terrorism in Pakistan... As outsiders they are correct in doing what they think is best for them....
The onus is on Pakistan is to improve its image to the external world about its law and order situation....

(BTW, having heard Miandad speak before, he is not half as articulate as he is made out to be in this piece...)
[/QUOTE]

this thing has been debated way 2 many times now. there is no risk to any one's life. it was just a "small" bomb on a 10th floor of a bldg. dint kill anyone. karachi could have been moved . the matches could've been played elsewhere. How many bombs go off in guranwala, or hyderabad or rawal pindi or faisalabad ?!

And Pakistan image is just fine, xcept ofcourse for indians whose pasttime #1 is to bash pakistan for every wrong thing in their country. Law n order needs to be improved in ur country much more then in pakistan. Underworld is much more prominent in India, and is connected with every walks of life. They can get away with whatever they want because they know the gov is gonna blame pkaistan. Ur cowardly government finds it terribly easy to just put the onus on pakistan. if they worked that hard on their security systems it would be a much safer place.

N dont forget thou it is an underworld don from ur country that operates that building, and he is in effect the person behind the bombing. If the indian goverment was strong enough to stop mafia kingpin's like him, he wouldn't have created havoc in india and pakistan like he has been doing directly and indirectly in the past.

South Africa in Pakistan 2003-04
Boucher has mixed feelings over tour cancellation
Telford Vice - September 21, 2003

Mark Boucher has admitted to having mixed feelings over South Africa’s decision to cancel their tour of Pakistan. The South Africans were scheduled to depart for Pakistan on Sunday, but the board pulled out of the tour on Saturday in the wake of a bomb blast in an office block in Karachi on Friday. “It’s a sad thing for an international cricket tour to be called off because it’s not safe for players in a different country,” Boucher told Wisden CricInfo.

“I feel sorry for the Pakistanis. Apart from the Bangladesh tour they haven’t been able to play a home series for ages, and I know we wouldn’t enjoy having to play all of our matches away from home. Some of our guys who haven’t played in the sub-continent are missing out, but I’m sure they will get the chance again.”

That said, the cancellation couldn’t have come at a better time for Boucher and his team-mates. “We’ve just come off a long tour, three months away in England,” Boucher said. “We had 10 days between the tours. That’s just about enough time to get your washing done and start packing again. That’s what I mean when I say I have mixed feelings about it.”

However, Boucher was at pains to point out that the team was committed to the tour before the Karachi blast. “It wasn’t the players’ decision [to pull out of the tour], it was the UCB’ s,” he said. “The players were worried because there was a safety issue, but we were ready to go.” The cancellation followed an earlier decision to proceed with the tour that was taken after a UCB safety delegation visited Pakistan. That decision was conditional on the security situation in the country not deteriorating before or during the tour. “We agreed that if the risk assessment changed the decision to go would be reconsidered,” Boucher insisted.

The chief executive of the South African Cricketers’ Association, Tony Irish, was quoted in a Sunday newspaper as saying the players were “hugely relieved” the tour had not gone ahead. Boucher confirmed that view. “Let’s not beat around the bush, the sub-continent isn’t the best place to tour,” he said candidly. “There is a big culture change and you are confined to your hotel most of the time. But it is an important part of a player’s development. It does your skill levels the world of good to play there.”

Boucher said he would make productive use of most of his unexpected time off. “I think I’m going to play a bit of golf, and I’m looking forward to doing some pre-season training with Border. It’s an opportunity for us to play in our domestic competitions, because as national players we have a responsibility to our provinces as well.” Followers of provincial cricket, at least, will not feel short-changed by the international non-event. “Our first match is against Western Province, which means you’ll have Makhaya Ntini, Monde Zondeki and Charles Langeveldt up against Herschelle Gibbs, Graeme Smith and Jacques Kallis,” Boucher said.

http://www-usa.cricket.org/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2003/SEP/261281_CI_21SEP2003.html

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by Some1: *
What bull.... the SA players are only cricket players... why should they risk their lives for something which is not of their making....its not for SA to promote or discourage terrorism in Pakistan... As outsiders they are correct in doing what they think is best for them....
The onus is on Pakistan is to improve its image to the external world about its law and order situation....

(BTW, having heard Miandad speak before, he is not half as articulate as he is made out to be in this piece...)
[/QUOTE]

Miandad was right dear, for the sake of argumet just suppose that there is a real threat of terrorism in Karachi but then Govt all over the world dont negotiate to terrorist in any such situation like hostages etc why? Just because that is taken as "supporting the terrisom". When Bush says "If you are not with USA, you are supporting terrorism" then everyone (including Indians) move there head in yes like anything but oh He is bush and this is Miandad, lot of difference when it comes to dumbs and blinds!

[quote]

*That said, the cancellation couldn't have come at a better time for Boucher and his team-mates. "We've just come off a long tour, three months away in England," Boucher said. "We had 10 days between the tours. That's just about enough time to get your washing done and start packing again. That's what I mean when I say I have mixed feelings about it." *.....

...The chief executive of the South African Cricketers' Association, Tony Irish, was quoted in a Sunday newspaper as saying the players were "hugely relieved" the tour had not gone ahead. Boucher confirmed that view. "Let's not beat around the bush, the sub-continent isn't the best place to tour," he said candidly. "There is a big culture change and you are confined to your hotel most of the time. But it is an important part of a player's development. It does your skill levels the world of good to play there."

[/quote]

Do i have to say anything? So Goras dont like to visit Sub-continent and thats India, Pakisan, BD and SL. From day one they were not willing to visit!

Pak players wear armbands, fans protest against SA’s pull out](http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/)

By Waheed Khan

KARACHI: The Pakistan team players and officials on Sunday used the One-day International against Bangladesh to voice their anger against the South Africans decision of pulling out from the Pakistan tour just 48 hours before they were due to land in Karachi.

As dozens of demonstrators gathered outside the National Stadium main gate carrying placards and protesting the South African decision, the Pakistan players wore black armbands to convey to the world what they felt of the South African pull-out.

“It is our way of telling the world that we are unhappy with the way South Africa has let us down,” Pakistan coach Javed Miandad told reporters at the National Stadium.

And he insisted that the players had decided that enough was enough with the way foreign teams were ostracizing Pakistan as an international cricket venue and they would not agree to playing the home series against South Africa at any other venue other than in Pakistan.

“We are not going to accept the South African offer to play at a neutral venue. When West Indies and Australia played against us at neutral venues the situation was different now there is no danger to any touring side,” Miandad insisted.

“Our stance is simple; the South African players may have genuine concerns about their security in Pakistan but by not touring Pakistan they are promoting and encouraging terrorism in some form,” he said.

“Today’s match is an answer to South Africa that there is no danger of international matches being disrupted in Pakistan. The Bangladesh players and other foreign officials including their coach and physio have been in Pakistan for the last five weeks without any problems. So how can South Africa assume someone will harm them in Pakistan?” he added.

Miandad said after the series against Bangladesh is over, senior players would be sitting down together and discussing a joint representation and stand from the players on the practice of teams continuing to boycott Pakistan as an international venue.

“You can’t rule out the possibility of harsh reactions from us,” he said.

The Pakistan coach said what surprised him was that if the South African cricketers didn’t want to play in Pakistan they should have straightaway refused from the outset instead of going through a charade of security concerns and drills.

“All I can say is that the South Africans cricketers and board have left some 140 million people of Pakistan disgusted.”

Some 50 cricket fans protested against South Africa’s pull out outside the stadium before the start of the play.

The demonstrators were carrying placards that read ‘Please reconsider your decision’, ‘Proteas - you are losers’, ‘Our parents also love us you cowards’, ‘Our lives are also valuable Mr Smith’ and ‘No sympathy with South Africa anymore’.

Meanwhile, former Pakistan captain Intikhab Alam said it was very unfortunate that South Africa had refused to tour Pakistan but felt that the Pakistan board had itself to blame for this situation.

“We should never have acceded to demands from the West Indies and Australia to play our home series at neutral venues last year. It set a very bad precedent,” he said.

Intikhab insisted that it was impossible for any Board or Government to give

security guarantee anywhere in the world." “Teams should come to Pakistan with open minds but South Africa had preconceived ideas and it is sad.”

PCB may send representative to South Africa for tour negotiations](http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/)

"By our correspondent

KARACHI: The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) is exploring the possibility of flying out a representative to South Africa by Tuesday to convince the United Cricket Board of South Africa (UCBSA) and its players associations to review their decision to cancel their tour of Pakistan.

‘The News’ has learnt that such an idea had been discussed on Sunday between the Chairman Lt. General Tauqir Zia and chief executive Rameez Raja but nothing was final as yet.

“The feeling is that Rameez would stand a very good chance of having fruitful negotiations with the South Africans across the table rather than on telephone or through video conferencing,” a Board source disclosed.

But Rameez said that he would be flying back to Lahore on Monday morning as the Chairman had scheduled a meeting in which the South African’s cancellation would be discussed and future line of action would be decided.

“We have not given up hope as yet. We have sent a rescheduled itinerary to the South Africans reducing the test series to two matches and three One-dayers. We have also offered them a shift of venue (s). But so far we are waiting for a response from them,” he said. “We are giving them the option of playing just two tests now so that they can make the tour even after a week’s delay,” he said. Board sources said they were expecting a response from the South Africans on the revised itinerary and tour in the next 48 hours.

“The PCB has also asked the match-referee Mike Procter to use his influence to convince the UCBSA about the ground realities about security in Pakistan as he has been in the country for the last five weeks,” a Board source said.

“The PCB is hoping that Procter who is due to return home tomorrow will also be able to convince the UCBSA and players to review their cancellation decision,” the source said.

In the original itinerary, South Africa was to play three tests at Lahore, Peshawar and Karachi, but the PCB has now cancelled the Karachi match and given the option of playing the Peshawar test in Rawalpindi to the South Africans.

He said Pakistan had already sent a letter to the International Cricket Council (ICC) drawing its attention to the financial losses that would be incurred by Pakistan if South Africa didn’t reverse their decision. “We have certain contractual obligations with our television producers and we have to give them a minimum number of international matches everyday,” he said.

The Dubai-based Ten Sports channel which markets television rights for the PCB have sold the rights of the South African series to broadcasters for over $ four million. Rameez said Pakistan was very concerned about the financial implications from South Africa’s cancelled tour and would pursue this matter with the ICC and the UCBSA if the rescheduled itinerary was not accepted.

"Obviously we are very upset with what has happened and with the way the South Africans have gone about this issue. But we are trying to convince them they have a certain obligation to the sport and to the people of Pakistan as responsible members of the cricket community and as global partners of the ICC.

Rameez said he had spoken to some UCBSA officials and pointed out that the South African cricketers now had a very good opportunity to become heroes by agreeing to tour Pakistan after all.

“It is a tour everyone has been looking forward too. It would be disappointing if it didn’t come through,” he said.

Rameez is doing a great job here by giving the South Africans every opportunity to come out of this with their reputations still intact. With the Karachi venue being sidelined, despite the fact that no international cricketer has ever come to harm in that city, SA players have a great opportunity to prove that they are interested in playing international cricket rather than domestic knockabouts and a few games of golf.

Hats off to Rameez :k:

Yeah Ramiz Raja should lead the representative delegation if PCB decided to send it. The guy knows how to do the talking!

Pakistan appeal to ICC, and set South Africa a tour deadline](http://www-usa.cricket.org/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2003/SEP/261590_CI_22SEP2003.html)
Wisden CricInfo Staff - September 22, 2003

Pakistan have sought the aid of the International Cricket Council to force South Africa to honour their commitment to tour their country. If South Africa won’t, Pakistan have said they have no other option but to enforce their right to take the matter, and a claim for damages, to the ICC’s disputes resolution committee.

Lieutenant General (retired) Tauqir Zia, the chairman of the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), made the written request today. South Africa cancelled the tour on Saturday, on the verge of their side leaving yesterday for the tour. What Pakistan have called, an “isolated” bomb, exploded on Friday, about five miles (8km) away from the National Stadium in Karachi. South Africa were due to play their opening tour game, a one-day warm-up match, at the Stadium on Wednesday, followed by the first one-day international on Friday.

Pakistan have given the South Africans a deadline of this evening to make their final decision. Zia said the bomb incident, in which there were no casualties, occurred because of a feud between two factions and was not a terrorist act.

**Tauqir wrote to ICC president Ehsan Mani and warned that if the ICC did not intervene, it would be forced to refuse to honour its own commitments to those countries who decline to visit Pakistan. ** :k:

"The ICC must keep in mind the loss Pakistan cricket will suffer due to this act of the United Cricket Board of South Africa (UCBSA). We have already suffered at the hands of the Indian Government’s reluctance to allow the Indian team to play with Pakistan. The loss is to the tune of $US30million. If other teams also do not visit Pakistan then the loss to Pakistan cricket will be unbearable.

“It is not only the loss because of the South African visit but also the reluctance of the subsequent teams. Pakistan cricket will lose around $US7million from the South African tour and $US3million from New Zealand’s tour. And if India chooses not to send its team to Pakistan in February, the loss will be $US11million.”

Tauqir also made the point that while the cancellation affected revenue, there were also costs to the promotion and development of cricket, the cost in the public being deprived their chance to watch sport, the loss to Pakistan television who would not be able to generate advertising on the back of the cricket, and there was also the cost involved in maintaining huge stadia that were not being used.

"Such losses are unacceptable to Pakistan cricket…We have already written to the UCBSA suggesting postponement by a week and excluding Karachi as a venue. A copy of rescheduled tour has also been sent to you. We expect the UCBSA to cooperate with us as we have done with everyone including touring countries where the threat to the security of players was far more serious.

**“We expect the ICC to intervene and instruct the UCBSA to take the tour as planned. We would hate to end up in a situation whereby we are forced not to honour our commitments to those countries who decline to visit Pakistan,” said Tauqir. ** :k:

“Bangladesh played the fifth ODI of their series in Karachi without any security concerns. Furthermore, the ICC match referee Mike Procter, who is from South Africa, also does not support the decision of the UCBSA,” he claimed.

Tauqir said he had spoken twice with South Africa’s High Commissioner in Pakistan and that he also did not support the UCBSA decision. According to him, Pakistan was a safe place particularly for South African nationals.

He also reminded the ICC president of the 1998 incident in which the PCB was under pressure from the Pakistan team members to cancel their tour of South Africa after the mugging incident in which two of their players were injured. **“The crime rate in Johannesburg is far greater than anywhere else but teams visit South Africa regularly. On the contrary, Pakistan government has assured security to visiting teams of the level given to the VVIPS,” he said. **

General Tauqir said the UCBSA had taken a unilateral decision without consulting the PCB, the ICC or their High Commission in Pakistan. “They had initially expressed reservations on playing at two venues, Karachi and Peshawar, but later agreed to go ahead with the tour after their security personnel visited Pakistan. These personnel were fully satisfied with the security aspects and on the basis of their assessment, UCBSA allowed the tour to proceed as scheduled.”

**In a separate letter, Tauqir enlisted the support of the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) through its president Mohammad Asghar Ali and requested a united front be put forward as resolved at the ACC special general meeting in Sharjah last year.

That resolution was: “…It was further decided that in case of failure by any country within or outside Asia for reasons not beyond the control of the Cricket Boards and force majeure, the four Test-playing countries of Asia would automatically refuse either to visit or host that particular country.” ** :k:

Tauqir asked Ali to consult with other members and ask both the ICC or UCBSA to ensure the tour goes ahead and he asked that the matter be given priority treatment.

First of all it was ridiculous decision done by the Proteas.
But the main blame should go to the ICC for making a schedule so busy for the South Africans.
I know I wouldn't want to play in Pakistan in hot and scorching month of September after a long 5 test match tour of England.
You can't simply expect 1 team to play 8 test in space of 3 months.

South Africa's pull out is an excuse, I don't think it has anything to do with the security.
The best possible solution would be to schedule the series 1 month later when both sides will be willing to play each other.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by UMAIR316: *
First of all it was ridiculous decision done by the Proteas.
But the main blame should go to the ICC for making a schedule so busy for the South Africans.
I know I wouldn't want to play in Pakistan in hot and scorching month of September after a long 5 test match tour of England.
You can't simply expect 1 team to play 8 test in space of 3 months.

South Africa's pull out is an excuse, I don't think it has anything to do with the security.
The best possible solution would be to schedule the series 1 month later when both sides will be willing to play each other.
[/QUOTE]

i totally agree, an isolated bomb incident in an empty building is not a legitimate threat to pull out of a series...SA was basically crossing there fingers for anything that could mildly affect the security situation and they jumped on it....the best thing to do is reschedule it because its obvious they're in no mood to play right now

New Zealand forced to play another waiting game
Lynn McConnell - September 22, 2003


New Zealand might be third on the Test rankings, but when it comes to playing the diplomatic waiting game, they are away out in front. And they face another two-month match in their lead-up to the tour of Pakistan.

South Africa’s decision to pull out of their Pakistan tour has immediate implications for New Zealand who have been more affected by bomb-disrupted tours than any of the cricket-playing nations. New Zealand are due to be the next side to tour Pakistan, starting on November 21 at the end of their tour of India.

Pakistan, deprived of international cricket against all but Bangladesh, since the May bombing which ended New Zealand’s tour of 2002, is playing all the cards it can in order to ensure that it gets some cricket in front of its large core of cricket fans. That is hardly surprising, and it is difficult to see the International Cricket Council not responding to Pakistan’s plea that South Africa take part in the tour.
**
Pakistan represents such a significant place in the world game, its players are among the most skilful in the world, and they always bring an element of excitement in their play. Their bowling resources in recent times have been among the most fabulous in the game’s history. Wasim Akram, Waqar Younis, Saqlain Mushtaq, Shoaib Akhtar and Mushtaq Ahmed have been superb servants of the game, while the future threat is represented by Mohammad Sami.

Players of their competitiveness have to be exposed to their own fans and are vital to the continued health of cricket in Pakistan. In light of the latest events New Zealand have said they will continue to review the security situation in Pakistan. They had gained a concession to their reasonable request not to play in Karachi on their tour.
**
Martin Snedden, the chief executive of New Zealand Cricket, who has been in India for an ICC management meeting, said: “We will continue to work through our usual pre-tour safety and security checks and will continue to monitor the security situation in Pakistan in the lead-up to the Black Caps tour.”

New Zealand’s return is hugely significant for Pakistan authorities. As the side forced to leave their tour on the scheduled first day of their second Test last year was supposed to start in Karachi as the result of a devastating bomb blast outside their hotel, their return is symbolic of a return to normality and representative of recovered stability in Pakistan.

South Africa were going to be there before New Zealand, and may still be if revised tour changes are accepted by the South African authorities. But with New Zealand in the immediate vicinity during their Indian tour, there has to be hope that the New Zealanders can complete their touring obligation.
**
The implications for not touring are much more serious now. The Asian Cricket Council has been brought into the South African argument in a bid to ensure solidarity among the Asian nations in the face of refusals to tour. Those refusals would be met by a counter refusal to tour by all the member nations of the ACC.

The situation has immediate consequences for New Zealand, even without the ACC involvement. A failure to tour Pakistan could be reflected in a non-return tour at Christmas-New Year by Pakistan.

Diplomacy has become as much a part of the cricket requirements in New Zealand as dealing with players’ unions, new governance, development requirements and financial analysis. And some careful consideration will be assured in the forthcoming weeks.
**
© Wisden CricInfo Ltd

http://www-usa.cricket.org/link_to_database/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2003/SEP/261600_NZ_22SEP2003.html

Everyone please stick to the topic.

Pakistan threaten to sue SA](BBC SPORT | Cricket | South Africa consider new plan)

Graeme Smith’s side have had safety fears over touring Pakistan
Pakistan has threatened to claim £2.1m compensation from South Africa for their cancelled tour.
The amount would cover lost sponsorship and television rights after South Africa pulled out with safety concerns.

PCB chairman Tauqir Zia wrote a letter asking International Cricket Council president Ehsan Mani to intervene

“The ICC must keep in mind the loss Pakistan cricket would suffer due to South Africa’s pullout,” said Zia.

Pakistan has also offered to drop Karachi, site of the bomb blast on Friday that led to a change in South Africa’s minds, as a venue.

“The revised itinerary does not include Karachi and has Peshawar/Rawalpindi as the second Test match venue,” said PCB spokesman Samiul Hasan.

The United Cricket Board of South Africa (UCB) has offered to host the series, play at a neutral venue or postpone to a later date.

Zia also wrote a letter to his South African counterparts, referring to a past incident when it supported the UCB when Pakistan players were unwilling to tour South Africa in 1998 after a mugging incident .

Pakistan players wore black armbands during Sunday’s one-day international against Bangladesh and dozens of fans staged a demonstration outside the stadium.

New Zealand, who cut short their 2002 tour because of a Karachi bomb are scheduled to play five one-day internationals in Pakistan in November.

“We will continue to work through our usual pre-tour safety and security checks and continue to monitor the situation in Pakistan in the lead-up to the tour,” said New Zealand Cricket chief executive Martin Snedden.

[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by UMAIR316: *
First of all it was ridiculous decision done by the Proteas.
But the main blame should go to the ICC for making a schedule so busy for the South Africans.
I know I wouldn't want to play in Pakistan in hot and scorching month of September after a long 5 test match tour of England.

[/QUOTE]

I doubt whether the ICC schedules massive 3 month test series in England, these tours generate a lot of money for the home side and the grounds are usually full so the ICC probably just goes along with the wishes of the two teams taking part. Unfortunately for us our series against SA is immediately follwing on, so we get the backlash. Asian cricket has a lot of clout internationally which is why General Zia has enlisted the ACC, but for that to have a genuine voice and shake these teams out of their arrogance, it would require India to take a stand. However, India's obsession with side-lining Pakistan would probably see them lining up with the other side.

South African cricket bosses to discuss reviving tour to Pakistan](Yahoo is part of the Yahoo family of brands.)

JOHANNESBURG (AFP) - South African cricket bosses will meet in Johannesburg to discuss reviving the cancelled tour to Pakistan, the United Cricket Board of South Africa (UCBSA) said.

The UCBSA said its chief executive, Gerald Majola, had received a letter from his counterpart at the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB), Ramiz Raja, offering alternative fixtures.

“Gerald Majola is to convene a meeting of the management committee of Cricket South Africa in Johannesburg on Tuesday to discuss the PCB proposal and to receive a full briefing from security consultants,” the UCBSA said in a statement on Monday.

The Proteas called off their tour to Pakistan on Saturday after a bomb blast in an empty Karachi office building on Friday night. No one was injured in the explosion.

The decision to call off the tour was made one day before the South African team were due to depart for a three-match one-day series and three Test series.

The UCBSA said security in Pakistan had deteriorated to an unacceptable level, and offered to either play the series outside Pakistan or delay the tour until security improved.

The PCB has refused to play the series away from home.

Its new fixtures exclude Karachi and have the option of excluding Peshawar.

The UCBSA committee will consult with the South African government, national coach Eric Simons and captain Graeme Smith before a final decision is made.

“We made a decision on Saturday, based on information from our security consultants who had also been in contact with intelligence agencies,” Majola added.

“That information was that the situation in Pakistan, particularly following a bomb blast in Karachi on Friday evening, meant that sending our team to Karachi on Sunday as planned would have constituted an unacceptable risk.”

Majola said the UCBSA would continue to assess the security situation and continue to look at it in relation to the proposed alternative fixtures.

“We will continue to make every effort to find alternatives that do not pose an unacceptable level of risk to our national team,” he said.

Earlier on Monday Pakistan threatened to sue South Africa for 3.5 million dollars in losses from the cancellation, urging the International Cricket Council to intervene to force a rethink by the Proteas.

UCB: “We Want To Tour” Tour Could Be Rescheduled

The vice-president of the United Cricket Board, Robbie Kurz, has reiterated the South African team’s desire to tour Pakistan, as long as they can be assured of their safety.

According to newspaper The Mercury, Kurz will on Monday hold a teleconference with the rest of the board of directors of Cricket South Africa, the body that controls professional cricket in the country. The board will discuss the viability of salvaging the tour, after South Africa cited security concerns and pulled out of the original tour on Saturday.

The chief executive of the UCB, Gerald Majola, on Sunday returned from an International Cricket Council meeting in Mumbai. Kurz admits that his board will rely heavily on Majola’s opinions on the tour.

“Gerald will give us the reaction of the ICC to the cancellation, so his input, which will represent world opinion, will obviously be all-important,” said Kurz.

“Our position is that we want to tour, so long as there are no unacceptable security risks.”

There have been several bomb blasts and incidents of suspected terrorist activity in Pakistan in the last year. The UCB last week sent a security delegation to consult with Pakistan cricket and police officials. Despite being satisfied with the security measures in place, the UCB was prompted to cancel the tour when another bomb was detonated in Karachi on Friday.

“Although we were aware of the wider effects the decision had on world cricket, the security of our players has to be our first priority,” Kurz continued.

"Basically, our policy is that we’ll play anyone, anywhere, so long as our security people are happy.

“At the moment they have serious doubts about security in Pakistan.”

http://www.cricketline.com/COUNTRY_BY_COUNTRY/South_Africa/story_10086.shtml

Right on by PCB for threatning SA by saying we will sue SA for 2.1 million. Now I can see UCB showing interest towards touring PAK. :k:

SA labelled as cowards in Pakistan :smiley:

by Johann de Jager
Posted on 21 September 2003 - 22:50

Graeme Smith and his South African cricket team are being labelled cowards in Pakistan after the cancellation of the tour to that country in the wake of the latest bomb explosion in Karachi.
No-one was hurt in Friday’s explosion, and local police have ruled out terrorism. Sunday’s one-day international in the city between Pakistan and Bangladesh went ahead without incident, although spectators displayed banners about the cancellation of the SA tour.

It is no secret that some of the South African players feared for their own safety and were considering withdrawing from the squad if the tour went ahead.

Smith said last week there was concern that the South African team could be targeted because of its prominence in world cricket.

The internet website cricinfo.org reports that the chairperson of the Pakistan Cricket Board was reportedly informed prior to the United Cricket Board of South Africa’s decision that the SA players were looking for an excuse to have the tour cancelled.

UCB general manager Gerald Majola has also been accused of practising double standards for attending a meeting of the cricket committee of the International Cricket Council in Mumbai, where there were several fatalities in a bomb blast about two weeks ago, yet supporting the decision to cancel to tour to Pakistan.

Majola said upon his return to South Africa on Sunday that he would comment on the UCB’s decision on Monday.

A PCB official is quoted by cricinfo as saying that the security situation in South Africa is not much better than that in Pakistan, since Pakistani players were advised during this year’s World Cup tournament in South Africa not to leave their hotel.

The PCB says it wants to save the SA tour and has requested the UCB for assistance, referring to the PCB’s role in ensuring that the 1998 tour of South Africa went ahead after threats to abort the tour in the wake of an alleged attack on two Pakistani players in Johannesburg.

The exact circumstances surrounding that particular incident are still not known

http://www.supercricket.co.za/article.asp?aId=94680&sportCategory=SUPERCRICKET/SATEAM

Grapevine reports that Ramiz Raja is off to SA to salvage the tour. Today Inzamam also spoke against the SA decision and said it is not fair.

I think Pakistan should talk to ACC (Asian Cricket Council) and use the same threat they used against NZ which forced the kiwis to tour Pakistan.