Re: Revisiting Abrogation
Logically it does make sense. Because revelations were within a very specific time period, while the time period between Injeel and torah and Quran is of centuries.
Injeel abrogated Torah because it was imperfect (due to time specific teachings) and doubtful (due to changes made by the people over time). Quran claims to be above both of these concepts while abrogating Injeel and Torah for these reasons.
If abrogation is to be considered even a viable concept in Islam, there must be some Hadiths about it. It is hard to imagine that AnHazoor (saw) didn't mention at all that a certain verse should be discredited when it was abrogated.
If Hadiths supporting abrogation doesn't exists, it is no harm in admitting that. I am just trying to understand the roots of such a belief.