[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by fuzznug: *
"Original expectations" were shorter than THREE WEEKS?
Please pass me some of what you're smokin'. :)
I can't bring myself to read the rest of this...
[/QUOTE]
The time was set in "myvoice's" expectation in another post - do some research. You sure the USA government are not feeding you some sort of criticizing-inhibiter drug there in the USA?
BTW: Don't waste your time reading the rest of that post, it is wayyy over your head.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by The Old Man: *
Might only be worth your while to visit in about a month. I don't foresee much changes being done quickly from now on (might be wrong).
[/QUOTE]
I don't either. But I believe changes will occur.
Takes time.
[QUOTE]
*Originally posted by The Old Man: *
The time was set in "myvoice's" expectation in another post - do some research.
[/QUOTE]
Old Man: Two entirely different threads and two entirely different topics. In one thread, people were asked to post different scenarios that they thought might occur during the war. I posted a scenario (if I recall correctly) that would have a two week war.
In my other thread, I asked some questions about attitudes on Iraq under a series of assumptions wherein one of the parameters was a relatively short war. How you connect my projected scenario to somehow defining what is a relatively short war makes no sense. In your recent post you admit "I agree that it was a very short war otherwise." Thank you. One full point for this item. :)