Questions for Sunnis

[wasir]

Bro paglu…
take off the glasses of hate and search through history books

When banu Hashim lived there for three years how did they survive.
…Who…used to take his goats(some narrate camels) to Shahb-e Talib to feed Banu Hashim???

Who was that man who was nearly scentenced to death due to supplying some materials(some historians say these were clothes)???

And who was that personality who saved them???

And who were those two or three people who played very active role in ending this social bycott???

I can easily mention their names and the details about their whole family
but I wouldn’t do that
because you will start slandering about them

and I don’t have refrences in hand at the moment anyway

Finally you wouldn’t accept it anyway, typical of yours
I am not here to convince you
But Bro do some research and find out, especially read the incidents reported by a Christian Historian

Originally posted by Pagluu:
**lets start from the first one then, shall we wasir

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif

1. History testifies that when Hadhrath Muhammad (saaws) declared his Prophethood (saaws), the Quraysh1 subjected the Bani Hashim to a boycott. Hadhrath Abu Talib (as) took the tribe to an area called Shib Abi Talib where they remained for three years, suffering from immense hardship2. Where were Hadhrath Abu Bakr and Hadhrath Umar during that period? They were in Makkah so why did they not help the Holy Prophet (saaws)? If they were unable to join the Prophet (saaws) at the Shib Abi Talib is there any evidence that they provided any type of support (food etc), breaching the agreement that the Quraysh boycott all food / business transactions with Bani Hashim???**

[This message has been edited by wasir (edited July 20, 2001).]

[Degas]

Originally posted by Pagluu:
**lets start from the first one then, shall we wasir

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif

1. History testifies that when Hadhrath Muhammad (saaws) declared his Prophethood (saaws), the Quraysh1 subjected the Bani Hashim to a boycott. Hadhrath Abu Talib (as) took the tribe to an area called Shib Abi Talib where they remained for three years, suffering from immense hardship2. Where were Hadhrath Abu Bakr and Hadhrath Umar during that period? They were in Makkah so why did they not help the Holy Prophet (saaws)? If they were unable to join the Prophet (saaws) at the Shib Abi Talib is there any evidence that they provided any type of support (food etc), breaching the agreement that the Quraysh boycott all food / business transactions with Bani Hashim???**

..what amazes me in this question is that the only person of any significance in this thing was Abu Lahab whose role and conduct against Prophet Muhammad is even mentioned in Quran. This is the only place in the Quran where a person from among the enemies of Islam has been condemned by name, whereas in Makkah as well as in Madinah. Abu Lahab was the only person to join with the enemies against his own relatives. But in this question no mention of him ??? There is even a Surah in Quran Al - Lahab in this regard..
So the worst enemy of Prophet of God has no significance for u but anyone who opposed slightly in some simple things against some of the family of Prophet u blow up the events so much and try to drag insignificant questions..
Start hating enemies of Prophet first if u wanna to hate somebody…

[Shah_Jahan]

Degas,

Shias hate Abu Lahab sunnis hate abu lahab!!
Shias hate abu lahab
Shias hate abu Lahab
Shias hate abu Lahab

Now that its clear that we hate him can you give us you ignorant guidance on the Question at hand?

Where was Abu bakar when Quraysh isolated prophet(with hazrat bin Abi talib)?

Did Umer come with food and clothing for the prophet as the holy Prophet was under Isolation?

Now we hate Abu Lahab let me remind you we also hate Firaun,samri and any other kutta that is cursed in Quran.

Now answer the Question or phone you Mufti guy and ask him!!

---

When the Lion is Dead, Every Assthinks it can Kick it!!!!

[Pagluu]

Originally posted by Degas:
**

Originally posted by Pagluu:
**lets start from the first one then, shall we wasir

http://www3.pak.org/gupshup/smilies/wink.gif

1. History testifies that when Hadhrath Muhammad (saaws) declared his Prophethood (saaws), the Quraysh1 subjected the Bani Hashim to a boycott. Hadhrath Abu Talib (as) took the tribe to an area called Shib Abi Talib where they remained for three years, suffering from immense hardship2. Where were Hadhrath Abu Bakr and Hadhrath Umar during that period? They were in Makkah so why did they not help the Holy Prophet (saaws)? If they were unable to join the Prophet (saaws) at the Shib Abi Talib is there any evidence that they provided any type of support (food etc), breaching the agreement that the Quraysh boycott all food / business transactions with Bani Hashim???**

..what amazes me in this question is that the only person of any significance in this thing was Abu Lahab whose role and conduct against Prophet Muhammad is even mentioned in Quran. This is the only place in the Quran where a person from among the enemies of Islam has been condemned by name, whereas in Makkah as well as in Madinah. Abu Lahab was the only person to join with the enemies against his own relatives. But in this question no mention of him ??? There is even a Surah in Quran Al - Lahab in this regard..
So the worst enemy of Prophet of God has no significance for u but anyone who opposed slightly in some simple things against some of the family of Prophet u blow up the events so much and try to drag insignificant questions..
Start hating enemies of Prophet first if u wanna to hate somebody…

**

bro Deags, At least ABU LAHAB was not made the khalia after rasool left.

Why did these people steal the right of Imam Ali (as)? Why was hazoor’s home burnt? Why were his grand-sons killed? why was his whole fammily taken hostage? Why were their chadors stolen? WHy were they treated worse then the prisoners?

When we say we love hazoor, we love everyone he loved too. Even Quran has ordered us to LOVE the family of our prophet and that the only AJAR rasool asked for against his risaalat.

This all happened because the khailafat was treated like a ball. It went hand in hand only for worldly gains.
Yeh log rasool kay dushman howe ya nahee? Aap battaen ab?